<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/comment-page-1/#comment-374334</link>
		<dc:creator>rafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3618#comment-374334</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about overload... Good article but this is really not written with our attention scarcity in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about overload&#8230; Good article but this is really not written with our attention scarcity in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/comment-page-1/#comment-374333</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3618#comment-374333</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mark.  I totally agree.  And that Shirky speech was excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark.  I totally agree.  And that Shirky speech was excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markb</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/comment-page-1/#comment-374332</link>
		<dc:creator>markb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3618#comment-374332</guid>
		<description>The Wire&#039;s David Simon is more concise on the topic in his talk &quot;The Audacity of Despair&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/webcast_Simon.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/webcast_Simo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Highly recommended. HT @hughmcguire&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He says journalists have simply stopped asking &#039;why&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes there is a filter problem -- see Shirky&#039;s excellent speech at Web2.0NYC &lt;a href=&quot;http://web2expo.blip.tv/file/1277460/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://web2expo.blip.tv/file/1277460/&lt;/a&gt; -- but journalism doesn&#039;t have to get all academic to solve its problems. Forget the attention economy. Forget complicated filtering. Rediscover the &#039;why&#039; and readers will find you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wire&#39;s David Simon is more concise on the topic in his talk &#8220;The Audacity of Despair&#8221; <a href="http://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/webcast_Simon.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/webcast_Simo&#8230;</a><br />Highly recommended. HT @hughmcguire</p>
<p>He says journalists have simply stopped asking &#39;why&#39;.</p>
<p>Yes there is a filter problem &#8212; see Shirky&#39;s excellent speech at Web2.0NYC <a href="http://web2expo.blip.tv/file/1277460/" rel="nofollow">http://web2expo.blip.tv/file/1277460/</a> &#8212; but journalism doesn&#39;t have to get all academic to solve its problems. Forget the attention economy. Forget complicated filtering. Rediscover the &#39;why&#39; and readers will find you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/comment-page-1/#comment-344188</link>
		<dc:creator>rafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3618#comment-344188</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about overload... Good article but this is really not written with our attention scarcity in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about overload&#8230; Good article but this is really not written with our attention scarcity in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event: London Media Summit 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/journalism-filtering-interpretation-context/comment-page-1/#comment-344182</link>
		<dc:creator>Event: London Media Summit 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3618#comment-344182</guid>
		<description>[...] relevance in an â€¨age of too much information by Bree Nordenson of the Columbia Journalist Review Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relevance in an â€¨age of too much information by Bree Nordenson of the Columbia Journalist Review Journalism: Filtering, interpretation, context on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

