<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denton: Everyone into the bomb shelter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Denton&#8217;s Evil Genius: No One Likes Humor in Tough Times &#124; TekPopuli</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-344096</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Denton&#8217;s Evil Genius: No One Likes Humor in Tough Times &#124; TekPopuli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3535#comment-344096</guid>
		<description>[...] sir, although the usual vultures are circling, a tip of the hat to Nick Denton is well deserved, because I mean, who really needs the tonic of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sir, although the usual vultures are circling, a tip of the hat to Nick Denton is well deserved, because I mean, who really needs the tonic of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-374936</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3535#comment-374936</guid>
		<description>Something I&#039;m sure will come out of all of this: Building online media businesses that are designed as &quot;destinations&quot; will make monetization extremely difficult. The key to surviving the downturn is to drive as much traffic as possible from search and monetize with AdSense and other transaction-based programs, rather than direct ad inventory or display ad networks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MFA (made-for-Adsense) gets a bad rap, because traditionally it&#039;s associated with spammy content and black-hat SEO practices, but designing content-based businesses around monetizing search traffic is much more downturn-immune than, for example, the Gawker model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our site has just started to take off (now in the ~50,000 uniques / month range, up from about 30,000 last month and 15,000 the previous month) and the only monetization that works for us is AdSense and Amazon Affiliates. The display ad networks we&#039;ve experimented with can&#039;t begin to come close to the eCPMs we achieve, and that&#039;s without a great deal of optimization.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, most people are still thinking about questions such as how to sell advertising against their content, rather than how to shift their mindset to serve ads to a different kind of audience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not suggesting that sites with a large regular community aren&#039;t important, but that they need to be combined with a monetization strategy that isn&#039;t about having a sales guy / sales force, a media kit and a bunch of traditional sponsorship and banner placement options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will spending on Google dry up and result in dwindling AdSense eCPMs? Possibly, but more likely that will hit those using AdSense purely as a last resort supplement with very little thought given to placement and SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I&#39;m sure will come out of all of this: Building online media businesses that are designed as &#8220;destinations&#8221; will make monetization extremely difficult. The key to surviving the downturn is to drive as much traffic as possible from search and monetize with AdSense and other transaction-based programs, rather than direct ad inventory or display ad networks.</p>
<p>MFA (made-for-Adsense) gets a bad rap, because traditionally it&#39;s associated with spammy content and black-hat SEO practices, but designing content-based businesses around monetizing search traffic is much more downturn-immune than, for example, the Gawker model.</p>
<p>Our site has just started to take off (now in the ~50,000 uniques / month range, up from about 30,000 last month and 15,000 the previous month) and the only monetization that works for us is AdSense and Amazon Affiliates. The display ad networks we&#39;ve experimented with can&#39;t begin to come close to the eCPMs we achieve, and that&#39;s without a great deal of optimization.</p>
<p>The thing is, most people are still thinking about questions such as how to sell advertising against their content, rather than how to shift their mindset to serve ads to a different kind of audience.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not suggesting that sites with a large regular community aren&#39;t important, but that they need to be combined with a monetization strategy that isn&#39;t about having a sales guy / sales force, a media kit and a bunch of traditional sponsorship and banner placement options.</p>
<p>Will spending on Google dry up and result in dwindling AdSense eCPMs? Possibly, but more likely that will hit those using AdSense purely as a last resort supplement with very little thought given to placement and SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher - Wednesday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-344078</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher - Wednesday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3535#comment-344078</guid>
		<description>[...] and media really does deserve a close read and some thought. You&#8217;ll likely want to read what Mathew Ingram has to say, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and media really does deserve a close read and some thought. You&#8217;ll likely want to read what Mathew Ingram has to say, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-344077</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3535#comment-344077</guid>
		<description>Something I&#039;m sure will come out of all of this: Building online media businesses that are designed as &quot;destinations&quot; will make monetization extremely difficult. The key to surviving the downturn is to drive as much traffic as possible from search and monetize with AdSense and other transaction-based programs, rather than direct ad inventory or display ad networks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MFA (made-for-Adsense) gets a bad rap, because traditionally it&#039;s associated with spammy content and black-hat SEO practices, but designing content-based businesses around monetizing search traffic is much more downturn-immune than, for example, the Gawker model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our site has just started to take off (now in the ~50,000 uniques / month range, up from about 30,000 last month and 15,000 the previous month) and the only monetization that works for us is AdSense and Amazon Affiliates. The display ad networks we&#039;ve experimented with can&#039;t begin to come close to the eCPMs we achieve, and that&#039;s without a great deal of optimization.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, most people are still thinking about questions such as how to sell advertising against their content, rather than how to shift their mindset to serve ads to a different kind of audience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not suggesting that sites with a large regular community aren&#039;t important, but that they need to be combined with a monetization strategy that isn&#039;t about having a sales guy / sales force, a media kit and a bunch of traditional sponsorship and banner placement options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will spending on Google dry up and result in dwindling AdSense eCPMs? Possibly, but more likely that will hit those using AdSense purely as a last resort supplement with very little thought given to placement and SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I&#39;m sure will come out of all of this: Building online media businesses that are designed as &#8220;destinations&#8221; will make monetization extremely difficult. The key to surviving the downturn is to drive as much traffic as possible from search and monetize with AdSense and other transaction-based programs, rather than direct ad inventory or display ad networks.</p>
<p>MFA (made-for-Adsense) gets a bad rap, because traditionally it&#39;s associated with spammy content and black-hat SEO practices, but designing content-based businesses around monetizing search traffic is much more downturn-immune than, for example, the Gawker model.</p>
<p>Our site has just started to take off (now in the ~50,000 uniques / month range, up from about 30,000 last month and 15,000 the previous month) and the only monetization that works for us is AdSense and Amazon Affiliates. The display ad networks we&#39;ve experimented with can&#39;t begin to come close to the eCPMs we achieve, and that&#39;s without a great deal of optimization.</p>
<p>The thing is, most people are still thinking about questions such as how to sell advertising against their content, rather than how to shift their mindset to serve ads to a different kind of audience.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not suggesting that sites with a large regular community aren&#39;t important, but that they need to be combined with a monetization strategy that isn&#39;t about having a sales guy / sales force, a media kit and a bunch of traditional sponsorship and banner placement options.</p>
<p>Will spending on Google dry up and result in dwindling AdSense eCPMs? Possibly, but more likely that will hit those using AdSense purely as a last resort supplement with very little thought given to placement and SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonknight</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/12/denton-everyone-into-the-bomb-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-344065</link>
		<dc:creator>jonknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3535#comment-344065</guid>
		<description>I think that the problem with online advertising is, and has always been, that advertisers are using the wrong model. Internet advertising is NOT the logical progression from television advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the problem with online advertising is, and has always been, that advertisers are using the wrong model. Internet advertising is NOT the logical progression from television advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

