<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking isn&#8217;t defamation, judge says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/linking-isnt-defamation-judge-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/linking-isnt-defamation-judge-says/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Court Rules That Linking To Defamatory Articles Isn&#8217;t Defamatory &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/linking-isnt-defamation-judge-says/comment-page-1/#comment-343680</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Court Rules That Linking To Defamatory Articles Isn&#8217;t Defamatory &#124; CyberLaw Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3251#comment-343680</guid>
		<description>[...] that it was libelous) is also libel. And, the good news is that a court has now agreed. It has sided with Jon Newton, the operator of P2PNet in noting that simply linking to libelous material is not, in itself, libelous. The ruling does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that it was libelous) is also libel. And, the good news is that a court has now agreed. It has sided with Jon Newton, the operator of P2PNet in noting that simply linking to libelous material is not, in itself, libelous. The ruling does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Court Rules That Linking To Defamatory Articles Isn&#8217;t Defamatory &#124; Technology Update News</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/linking-isnt-defamation-judge-says/comment-page-1/#comment-343677</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Court Rules That Linking To Defamatory Articles Isn&#8217;t Defamatory &#124; Technology Update News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3251#comment-343677</guid>
		<description>[...] that it was libelous) is also libel. And, the good news is that a court has now agreed. It has sided with Jon Newton, the operator of P2PNet in noting that simply linking to libelous material is not, in itself, libelous. The ruling does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that it was libelous) is also libel. And, the good news is that a court has now agreed. It has sided with Jon Newton, the operator of P2PNet in noting that simply linking to libelous material is not, in itself, libelous. The ruling does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian judge rules linking is not defamation &#124; Newslab.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/linking-isnt-defamation-judge-says/comment-page-1/#comment-343675</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian judge rules linking is not defamation &#124; Newslab.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3251#comment-343675</guid>
		<description>[...] you in trouble. This ruling will add to the debate over the legality of linking, which has been a thorny issue in Canada and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you in trouble. This ruling will add to the debate over the legality of linking, which has been a thorny issue in Canada and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

