<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Carr: Still wrong on Google, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Commodity Trading Accounts</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-374414</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Trading Accounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3215#comment-374414</guid>
		<description>“nothing to do with the network effect.” are you kidding???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“nothing to do with the network effect.” are you kidding???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodity Trading Accounts</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-343670</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Trading Accounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3215#comment-343670</guid>
		<description>â€œnothing to do with the network effect.â€ are you kidding???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œnothing to do with the network effect.â€ are you kidding???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who owns the keys to the clouds?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-343665</link>
		<dc:creator>Who owns the keys to the clouds?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3215#comment-343665</guid>
		<description>[...] October 26th called Web 2.0 and Cloud Computing which dragged in such luminaries as Nicholas Carr, Mathew Ingram and Alan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 26th called Web 2.0 and Cloud Computing which dragged in such luminaries as Nicholas Carr, Mathew Ingram and Alan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Effects, Monopoly and Cloud Computing &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-343658</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Effects, Monopoly and Cloud Computing &#124; CloudAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3215#comment-343658</guid>
		<description>[...] is just a myth. What do you think? Who do you think is right and why? Related articles by Zemanta Nick Carr: Still wrong on Google, Part 2 Reaching for the Sky Through The Compute Clouds How Cloud &amp; Utility Computing Are Different     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is just a myth. What do you think? Who do you think is right and why? Related articles by Zemanta Nick Carr: Still wrong on Google, Part 2 Reaching for the Sky Through The Compute Clouds How Cloud &amp; Utility Computing Are Different     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/26/nick-carr-still-wrong-on-google-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-343648</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3215#comment-343648</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Mike -- and I realize that what I&#039;m describing doesn&#039;t really fit the definition. But as I said to Brad in my reply above, I think Google is inextricably linked with the network effect created by the Web. And I don&#039;t see how Nick can say that the network effect had absolutely nothing to do with Google&#039;s success. That just doesn&#039;t make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right, Mike &#8212; and I realize that what I&#39;m describing doesn&#39;t really fit the definition. But as I said to Brad in my reply above, I think Google is inextricably linked with the network effect created by the Web. And I don&#39;t see how Nick can say that the network effect had absolutely nothing to do with Google&#39;s success. That just doesn&#39;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
