<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real vs. the MPAA: Dumb and dumberer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/real-vs-the-mpaa-dumb-and-dumberer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/real-vs-the-mpaa-dumb-and-dumberer/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickRoss</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/real-vs-the-mpaa-dumb-and-dumberer/comment-page-1/#comment-375110</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickRoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2729#comment-375110</guid>
		<description>The answer is obvious here. It really doesn&#039;t matter how good the DRM is that Real adds. They never had a right to have their hands on the media to begin with. The key here is that the copyright owner has rights. If Real had wanted to do a service like this, it could have sought to work with the studios. Instead it did the classic tech approach of &quot;infringe now, litigate (and hopefully settle) later.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is obvious here. It really doesn&#39;t matter how good the DRM is that Real adds. They never had a right to have their hands on the media to begin with. The key here is that the copyright owner has rights. If Real had wanted to do a service like this, it could have sought to work with the studios. Instead it did the classic tech approach of &#8220;infringe now, litigate (and hopefully settle) later.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickRoss</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/real-vs-the-mpaa-dumb-and-dumberer/comment-page-1/#comment-343247</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickRoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2729#comment-343247</guid>
		<description>The answer is obvious here. It really doesn&#039;t matter how good the DRM is that Real adds. They never had a right to have their hands on the media to begin with. The key here is that the copyright owner has rights. If Real had wanted to do a service like this, it could have sought to work with the studios. Instead it did the classic tech approach of &quot;infringe now, litigate (and hopefully settle) later.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is obvious here. It really doesn&#39;t matter how good the DRM is that Real adds. They never had a right to have their hands on the media to begin with. The key here is that the copyright owner has rights. If Real had wanted to do a service like this, it could have sought to work with the studios. Instead it did the classic tech approach of &#8220;infringe now, litigate (and hopefully settle) later.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

