<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian political blogosphere FTW!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-375251</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2731#comment-375251</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair point, Daniel.  I think blogs do tend to focus on personality, and could be criticized for fanning the flames a bit, or turning things into a witch hunt -- but at the same time, they are a leveling force as well, and a way of routing around entrenched bias in the traditional media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a fair point, Daniel.  I think blogs do tend to focus on personality, and could be criticized for fanning the flames a bit, or turning things into a witch hunt &#8212; but at the same time, they are a leveling force as well, and a way of routing around entrenched bias in the traditional media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-375250</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2731#comment-375250</guid>
		<description>I think that in general blogs have helped fan the flames of politics as a spectator sport, all about the cult of personality. So, yes, people are rightly &quot;outing&quot; politicians for their hypocrisy, but is the political system shifting in the right direction as a consequence of this? I wish it was, but it seems like politicians are more inclined than ever to make decisions based on populist nonsense rather than for the genuine good of the jurisdictions they represent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that in general blogs have helped fan the flames of politics as a spectator sport, all about the cult of personality. So, yes, people are rightly &#8220;outing&#8221; politicians for their hypocrisy, but is the political system shifting in the right direction as a consequence of this? I wish it was, but it seems like politicians are more inclined than ever to make decisions based on populist nonsense rather than for the genuine good of the jurisdictions they represent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Elmer</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-375249</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Elmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2731#comment-375249</guid>
		<description>oh...and I&#039;d wholeheartedly agree, they would be wrong. /ge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh&#8230;and I&#39;d wholeheartedly agree, they would be wrong. /ge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Elmer</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-375248</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Elmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2731#comment-375248</guid>
		<description>Matthew, who claims that bloggers are more important than MSM? I&#039;ve never heard that claim before. -Greg Elmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, who claims that bloggers are more important than MSM? I&#39;ve never heard that claim before. -Greg Elmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/30/canadian-political-blogosphere-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-343128</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2731#comment-343128</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair point, Daniel.  I think blogs do tend to focus on personality, and could be criticized for fanning the flames a bit, or turning things into a witch hunt -- but at the same time, they are a leveling force as well, and a way of routing around entrenched bias in the traditional media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a fair point, Daniel.  I think blogs do tend to focus on personality, and could be criticized for fanning the flames a bit, or turning things into a witch hunt &#8212; but at the same time, they are a leveling force as well, and a way of routing around entrenched bias in the traditional media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
