<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this what online news has come to?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alas, poor â€˜Frankâ€™ Â¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/comment-page-1/#comment-343276</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, poor â€˜Frankâ€™ Â¶ Personal Weblog of Joe Clark, Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2640#comment-343276</guid>
		<description>[...] was quick to boil over in the commentary to Ingramâ€™s latest headshaker, with Joe Clarkof the undercapitalized Tea Makers blog posting â€œHow disingenuous, Mathew, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was quick to boil over in the commentary to Ingramâ€™s latest headshaker, with Joe Clarkof the undercapitalized Tea Makers blog posting â€œHow disingenuous, Mathew, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechMeme and co. aggregate at the item l &#8230; &#171; Paul M. Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/comment-page-1/#comment-342954</link>
		<dc:creator>TechMeme and co. aggregate at the item l &#8230; &#171; Paul M. Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2640#comment-342954</guid>
		<description>[...] pm on September 19, 2008 &#124; # &#124;   Tags: aggregation, web   TechMeme and co. aggregate at the item level which is fine for v1.0 but the future surely is to dig into items. Diff all those similar posts, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pm on September 19, 2008 | # |   Tags: aggregation, web   TechMeme and co. aggregate at the item level which is fine for v1.0 but the future surely is to dig into items. Diff all those similar posts, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/comment-page-1/#comment-374536</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2640#comment-374536</guid>
		<description>I think the print newspapers have the same problem, but it is not so noticeable since you don&#039;t buy every newspaper to compare if they run the same story. Often they do. On Internet it seems worse just because technology allows us to harvest all those links and show them on one place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From another perspective, every techblog has its own audience. Shouldn&#039;t it post some news just because other were quicker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the print newspapers have the same problem, but it is not so noticeable since you don&#39;t buy every newspaper to compare if they run the same story. Often they do. On Internet it seems worse just because technology allows us to harvest all those links and show them on one place.</p>
<p>From another perspective, every techblog has its own audience. Shouldn&#39;t it post some news just because other were quicker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/comment-page-1/#comment-374535</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2640#comment-374535</guid>
		<description>Mathew,&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m with you on that. And the problem you describe is even much worse on mobile phones with their small screen real estate. I&#039;m guessing that a new generation of filtering technology will have to be invented (called, perhaps Needle - as in Haystack) to find wisdom amongst the noise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Randall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew,<br />I&#39;m with you on that. And the problem you describe is even much worse on mobile phones with their small screen real estate. I&#39;m guessing that a new generation of filtering technology will have to be invented (called, perhaps Needle &#8211; as in Haystack) to find wisdom amongst the noise.</p>
<p>Randall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/10/is-this-what-online-news-has-come-to/comment-page-1/#comment-374534</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2640#comment-374534</guid>
		<description>Yes, and techmeme is suddenly irrelevant in the greater scheme of things, much like technorati was the thing a few years ago, techmeme is basically useless as a way to get good stuff, because everyone writes for Techmeme now. There are other better sources that few know about that are much more relevant, and harder to game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and techmeme is suddenly irrelevant in the greater scheme of things, much like technorati was the thing a few years ago, techmeme is basically useless as a way to get good stuff, because everyone writes for Techmeme now. There are other better sources that few know about that are much more relevant, and harder to game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
