<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Embargoes: Thanks but no thanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; Nab-Excerpt</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-377314</link>
		<dc:creator>Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; Nab-Excerpt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2613#comment-377314</guid>
		<description>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#8217;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#8217;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#8217;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#8217;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; Family Learning Center</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-375398</link>
		<dc:creator>Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; Family Learning Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2613#comment-375398</guid>
		<description>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#8217;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#8217;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#8217;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#8217;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Embargoed or when you need to get public relations right &#8212; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-343699</link>
		<dc:creator>News Embargoed or when you need to get public relations right &#8212; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2613#comment-343699</guid>
		<description>[...] Embargoes: Thanks but no thanks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Embargoes: Thanks but no thanks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On relationship building for startups &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-342923</link>
		<dc:creator>On relationship building for startups &#124; CloudAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2613#comment-342923</guid>
		<description>[...] others and I&apos;m always keen to hear from people - so there ya go!Related articles by ZemantaEmbargoes: Thanks but no thanksAsk 37signals: 10 ways to &quot;get ink&quot;How to leverage Twitter to help your business grow22 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] others and I&apos;m always keen to hear from people &#8211; so there ya go!Related articles by ZemantaEmbargoes: Thanks but no thanksAsk 37signals: 10 ways to &quot;get ink&quot;How to leverage Twitter to help your business grow22 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; GroupHelp.NET</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-339113</link>
		<dc:creator>Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging &#124; GroupHelp.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2613#comment-339113</guid>
		<description>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#039;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#039;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging. We know there are lots of other ways to look at it. See, for example, Louis Gray&#8217;s excellent post this month where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram&#8217;s contrary post Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
