<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google knows what bloggers want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sid Savara</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/comment-page-1/#comment-374880</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Savara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2607#comment-374880</guid>
		<description>Although at $100, if you&#039;re making a trip out across country, getting a hotel, etc it&#039;s not a bad price at all. Its not free but it won&#039;t break you&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe they figured free would just be overrun with random people who were in the area, who aren&#039;t even bloggers.  At $100 you have to at least sort of want to see what it&#039;s about before going inside =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although at $100, if you&#39;re making a trip out across country, getting a hotel, etc it&#39;s not a bad price at all. Its not free but it won&#39;t break you</p>
<p>Maybe they figured free would just be overrun with random people who were in the area, who aren&#39;t even bloggers.  At $100 you have to at least sort of want to see what it&#39;s about before going inside =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/comment-page-1/#comment-374879</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2607#comment-374879</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, it&#039;s not normal for there to be &quot;tents&quot; that companies sponsor, where journalists have to pay for access.  It kind of surprises me that Google would do that, actually -- I would have expected them to provide it for free.  But perhaps they felt that providing it for free would cause a perception of bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, it&#39;s not normal for there to be &#8220;tents&#8221; that companies sponsor, where journalists have to pay for access.  It kind of surprises me that Google would do that, actually &#8212; I would have expected them to provide it for free.  But perhaps they felt that providing it for free would cause a perception of bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Savara</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/comment-page-1/#comment-374878</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Savara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2607#comment-374878</guid>
		<description>Very cool!  I don&#039;t know much about &quot;media tents&quot;, is it normal to charge for it, or do conventions etc typically just give access to journalists/bloggers for free?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or is the point that &quot;normal&quot; (independent?  non-affiliated?) bloggers can&#039;t get into normal press areas and thus this is their area to hang out?  Wasn&#039;t clear to me from the WSJ article, as it mentions at the Republican convention, 200 bloggers do have press passes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool!  I don&#39;t know much about &#8220;media tents&#8221;, is it normal to charge for it, or do conventions etc typically just give access to journalists/bloggers for free?</p>
<p>Or is the point that &#8220;normal&#8221; (independent?  non-affiliated?) bloggers can&#39;t get into normal press areas and thus this is their area to hang out?  Wasn&#39;t clear to me from the WSJ article, as it mentions at the Republican convention, 200 bloggers do have press passes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SidSavara</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/comment-page-1/#comment-338994</link>
		<dc:creator>SidSavara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2607#comment-338994</guid>
		<description>Although at $100, if you&#039;re making a trip out across country, getting a hotel, etc it&#039;s not a bad price at all. Its not free but it won&#039;t break you&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe they figured free would just be overrun with random people who were in the area, who aren&#039;t even bloggers.  At $100 you have to at least sort of want to see what it&#039;s about before going inside =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although at $100, if you&#39;re making a trip out across country, getting a hotel, etc it&#39;s not a bad price at all. Its not free but it won&#39;t break you</p>
<p>Maybe they figured free would just be overrun with random people who were in the area, who aren&#39;t even bloggers.  At $100 you have to at least sort of want to see what it&#39;s about before going inside =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/19/google-knows-what-bloggers-want/comment-page-1/#comment-338993</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2607#comment-338993</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, it&#039;s not normal for there to be &quot;tents&quot; that companies sponsor, where journalists have to pay for access.  It kind of surprises me that Google would do that, actually -- I would have expected them to provide it for free.  But perhaps they felt that providing it for free would cause a perception of bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, it&#39;s not normal for there to be &#8220;tents&#8221; that companies sponsor, where journalists have to pay for access.  It kind of surprises me that Google would do that, actually &#8212; I would have expected them to provide it for free.  But perhaps they felt that providing it for free would cause a perception of bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
