<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Hasbro right to kill Scrabulous?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Triple Points, Less 92 - The Web Laureate</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/comment-page-1/#comment-338949</link>
		<dc:creator>Triple Points, Less 92 - The Web Laureate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2570#comment-338949</guid>
		<description>[...] U [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nappy_rash</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/comment-page-1/#comment-374199</link>
		<dc:creator>nappy_rash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2570#comment-374199</guid>
		<description>NO, biggest exposure Scrabble ever had. It must have increased board sales, dumb move by Hasbro - they should wake up to the potential of exposure in Web 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, biggest exposure Scrabble ever had. It must have increased board sales, dumb move by Hasbro &#8211; they should wake up to the potential of exposure in Web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nappy_rash</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/comment-page-1/#comment-341241</link>
		<dc:creator>nappy_rash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2570#comment-341241</guid>
		<description>NO, biggest exposure Scrabble ever had. It must have increased board sales, dumb move by Hasbro - they should wake up to the potential of exposure in Web 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, biggest exposure Scrabble ever had. It must have increased board sales, dumb move by Hasbro &#8211; they should wake up to the potential of exposure in Web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianbetteridge</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/comment-page-1/#comment-341231</link>
		<dc:creator>ianbetteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2570#comment-341231</guid>
		<description>People have short memories. I&#039;d bet that within a year, the user-base of &quot;official&quot; Scrabble will equal or surpass that of Scrabulous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But even if that didn&#039;t happen, paying someone who&#039;s stolen your game and profited from it isn&#039;t a viable long-term business strategy. It&#039;s an invite for other people to do the same - and you can&#039;t buy them all, because that doesn&#039;t allow you to actually develop your own strategy for releasing your own property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have short memories. I&#39;d bet that within a year, the user-base of &#8220;official&#8221; Scrabble will equal or surpass that of Scrabulous. </p>
<p>But even if that didn&#39;t happen, paying someone who&#39;s stolen your game and profited from it isn&#39;t a viable long-term business strategy. It&#39;s an invite for other people to do the same &#8211; and you can&#39;t buy them all, because that doesn&#39;t allow you to actually develop your own strategy for releasing your own property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/29/was-hasbro-right-to-kill-scrabulous/comment-page-1/#comment-341230</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2570#comment-341230</guid>
		<description>Yeah, just reading that post now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, just reading that post now. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
