<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I hope Cuil isn&#8217;t an &#8220;epic fail&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-374807</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2568#comment-374807</guid>
		<description>Gave Cuil a brief try, it isn&#039;t there yet, but it&#039;s good to see something different. &lt;br&gt;Mostly Google is great, but sometimes it can be awful, it has its faults &amp; I think that&#039;s what you meant.  And it has become more spammy of recent.  So why is there no (real) competition ?  Is it so much that Google is fallible, everything is, but we&#039;ve gone stale on seeing the same old search engine ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gave Cuil a brief try, it isn&#39;t there yet, but it&#39;s good to see something different. <br />Mostly Google is great, but sometimes it can be awful, it has its faults &#038; I think that&#39;s what you meant.  And it has become more spammy of recent.  So why is there no (real) competition ?  Is it so much that Google is fallible, everything is, but we&#39;ve gone stale on seeing the same old search engine ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-339746</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2568#comment-339746</guid>
		<description>Gave Cuil a brief try, it isn&#039;t there yet, but it&#039;s good to see something different. &lt;br&gt;Mostly Google is great, but sometimes it can be awful, it has its faults &amp; I think that&#039;s what you meant.  And it has become more spammy of recent.  So why is there no (real) competition ?  Is it so much that Google is fallible, everything is, but we&#039;ve gone stale on seeing the same old search engine ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gave Cuil a brief try, it isn&#39;t there yet, but it&#39;s good to see something different. <br />Mostly Google is great, but sometimes it can be awful, it has its faults &#038; I think that&#39;s what you meant.  And it has become more spammy of recent.  So why is there no (real) competition ?  Is it so much that Google is fallible, everything is, but we&#39;ve gone stale on seeing the same old search engine ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seemsArtless</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-339745</link>
		<dc:creator>seemsArtless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2568#comment-339745</guid>
		<description>The importance of alternatives rings true with me. We talk so much about innovation, but then everyone jumps on a single bandwagon and there are only a few &#039;lost&#039; souls to support the competitors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was reminded of this when looking for a pair of portable stereo Bluetooth speakers -- take them to the dock, out in the back yard, no wires! But the latest and greatest iPhone / iPod can&#039;t support stereo Bluetooth out, so there is no market, so there are very few options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll give Cuil a try for a while, especially when I&#039;m searching for a wide ranging topic. The &#039;Explore by category&#039; looks like it could be really useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of alternatives rings true with me. We talk so much about innovation, but then everyone jumps on a single bandwagon and there are only a few &#39;lost&#39; souls to support the competitors. </p>
<p>I was reminded of this when looking for a pair of portable stereo Bluetooth speakers &#8212; take them to the dock, out in the back yard, no wires! But the latest and greatest iPhone / iPod can&#39;t support stereo Bluetooth out, so there is no market, so there are very few options.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll give Cuil a try for a while, especially when I&#39;m searching for a wide ranging topic. The &#39;Explore by category&#39; looks like it could be really useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-339744</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2568#comment-339744</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Matt.  I can&#039;t think of any off the top of my head right now -- I&#039;m sure that they were searches for relatively generic and/or spammy type terms -- but when I come across some I will be sure to let you know  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matt.  I can&#39;t think of any off the top of my head right now &#8212; I&#39;m sure that they were searches for relatively generic and/or spammy type terms &#8212; but when I come across some I will be sure to let you know  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/28/i-hope-cuil-isnt-an-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-339743</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2568#comment-339743</guid>
		<description>Hey Mathew, I&#039;d be interested to hear more about some of the Google searches that returned poor quality results, if you wanted to give some examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mathew, I&#39;d be interested to hear more about some of the Google searches that returned poor quality results, if you wanted to give some examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

