<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Yorker cover sparks blog firestorm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linker Barn: Tuesday, July 15</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-338681</link>
		<dc:creator>Linker Barn: Tuesday, July 15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2544#comment-338681</guid>
		<description>[...] New Yorker still getting its apple cored over Obama cover. See comments by the Rude [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Yorker still getting its apple cored over Obama cover. See comments by the Rude [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antje</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-375101</link>
		<dc:creator>antje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2544#comment-375101</guid>
		<description>I like this comment someone left on Gawker about it :&lt;br&gt;Lalina: But is it funny? Does it work? My feeling is, if you have to explain the joke, it&#039;s not a good joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this comment someone left on Gawker about it :<br />Lalina: But is it funny? Does it work? My feeling is, if you have to explain the joke, it&#39;s not a good joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antje</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-342932</link>
		<dc:creator>antje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2544#comment-342932</guid>
		<description>I like this comment someone left on Gawker about it :&lt;br&gt;Lalina: But is it funny? Does it work? My feeling is, if you have to explain the joke, it&#039;s not a good joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this comment someone left on Gawker about it :<br />Lalina: But is it funny? Does it work? My feeling is, if you have to explain the joke, it&#39;s not a good joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-342931</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2544#comment-342931</guid>
		<description>And the answer to the question &quot;does the blogosphere have a sense of humour or irony&quot; is a resounding NO...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think it&#039;s really stretching things to place this kind of satire in the same context as Loren Feldman. The difference here is that the New Yorker is eminently qualified to skewer Republican fearmongering. To succeed at satire you have to understand what it is you&#039;re satirizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the answer to the question &#8220;does the blogosphere have a sense of humour or irony&#8221; is a resounding NO&#8230;</p>
<p>But I think it&#39;s really stretching things to place this kind of satire in the same context as Loren Feldman. The difference here is that the New Yorker is eminently qualified to skewer Republican fearmongering. To succeed at satire you have to understand what it is you&#39;re satirizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/14/new-yorker-cover-sparks-blog-firestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-342930</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2544#comment-342930</guid>
		<description>I must admit, this case got me thinking about Loren Feldman and 1938media again -- not that Loren is the equivalent of the New Yorker or anything, but we&#039;re still talking about satire that some people have completely misinterpreted.  Is satire dead?  Or are there some things that simply can&#039;t (or shouldn&#039;t) be satirized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, this case got me thinking about Loren Feldman and 1938media again &#8212; not that Loren is the equivalent of the New Yorker or anything, but we&#39;re still talking about satire that some people have completely misinterpreted.  Is satire dead?  Or are there some things that simply can&#39;t (or shouldn&#39;t) be satirized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
