<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denton: Evil genius or just plain evil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-374762</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2537#comment-374762</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;... whether it encourages bloggers to go for the cheap and titillating is the subject of debate &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, maybe a dummy debate.    Gawker writers are masters of the cheap and titillating and are paid well to be that.    There are flashes of brilliance here and there but we are not talking about a journalistic high road here.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Valleywag is no... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.MathewIngram.com%21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.MathewIngram.com!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230; whether it encourages bloggers to go for the cheap and titillating is the subject of debate </i></p>
<p>Well, maybe a dummy debate.    Gawker writers are masters of the cheap and titillating and are paid well to be that.    There are flashes of brilliance here and there but we are not talking about a journalistic high road here.    </p>
<p>Valleywag is no&#8230; <a href="http://www.MathewIngram.com%21" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.MathewIngram.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MathewIngram.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-341179</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2537#comment-341179</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;... whether it encourages bloggers to go for the cheap and titillating is the subject of debate &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, maybe a dummy debate.    Gawker writers are masters of the cheap and titillating and are paid well to be that.    There are flashes of brilliance here and there but we are not talking about a journalistic high road here.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Valleywag is no... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.MathewIngram.com%21&quot;&gt;www.MathewIngram.com!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230; whether it encourages bloggers to go for the cheap and titillating is the subject of debate </i></p>
<p>Well, maybe a dummy debate.    Gawker writers are masters of the cheap and titillating and are paid well to be that.    There are flashes of brilliance here and there but we are not talking about a journalistic high road here.    </p>
<p>Valleywag is no&#8230; <a href="http://www.MathewIngram.com%21"></a><a href="http://www.MathewIngram.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MathewIngram.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-341178</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2537#comment-341178</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say &quot;low barrier to entry&quot;, but &quot;lower barriers to entry&quot;, which is much more than just semantics. I was saying &quot;lower&quot; relative to what it would have taken to start a competitor to a major publishing property in the 1980s. It&#039;s gone from &quot;virtually impossible unless you&#039;re already vastly wealthy&quot; to merely &quot;very difficult&quot;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as to the reason why a bunch of bloggers haven&#039;t cut out Nick Denton, well that will almost certainly happen, as it does in virtually every creative industry. And they&#039;ll go on to form their own network, which in turn will be criticized for exploiting the poor old bloggers who work for it rather than own it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Denton has momentum and a critical mass of readers, but these aren&#039;t things that are necessarily related to how much capital you have at your disposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t say &#8220;low barrier to entry&#8221;, but &#8220;lower barriers to entry&#8221;, which is much more than just semantics. I was saying &#8220;lower&#8221; relative to what it would have taken to start a competitor to a major publishing property in the 1980s. It&#39;s gone from &#8220;virtually impossible unless you&#39;re already vastly wealthy&#8221; to merely &#8220;very difficult&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>And as to the reason why a bunch of bloggers haven&#39;t cut out Nick Denton, well that will almost certainly happen, as it does in virtually every creative industry. And they&#39;ll go on to form their own network, which in turn will be criticized for exploiting the poor old bloggers who work for it rather than own it.</p>
<p>Denton has momentum and a critical mass of readers, but these aren&#39;t things that are necessarily related to how much capital you have at your disposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-341177</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2537#comment-341177</guid>
		<description>&quot;barriers to his bloggers going off and starting their own equivalent networks  ...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you&#039;ve been taken in by the mythology here. The cuckoo-clock repeating of &quot;Low barrier to entry! Low barrier to entry!&quot; seems to have as much factual basis behind it as that cuckoo. Because if it were really true, why haven&#039;t a bunch of bloggers simply cut out Nick Denton ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;barriers to his bloggers going off and starting their own equivalent networks  &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#39;ve been taken in by the mythology here. The cuckoo-clock repeating of &#8220;Low barrier to entry! Low barrier to entry!&#8221; seems to have as much factual basis behind it as that cuckoo. Because if it were really true, why haven&#39;t a bunch of bloggers simply cut out Nick Denton ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/04/denton-evil-genius-or-just-plain-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-341176</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2537#comment-341176</guid>
		<description>I agree, Daniel. I think Nick&#039;s model makes a lot of sense, and for&lt;br&gt;the most part it seems to be paying off -- and not just for him, but&lt;br&gt;for lots of his bloggers as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Daniel. I think Nick&#39;s model makes a lot of sense, and for<br />the most part it seems to be paying off &#8212; and not just for him, but<br />for lots of his bloggers as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

