<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symbian: Android for the rest of us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-374256</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2509#comment-374256</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Peter -- those are definitely aspects of the&lt;br&gt;Symbian world that will hold things back, I agree. And someone else&lt;br&gt;mentioned how integrated the iPhone is with the Mac OS, so that&lt;br&gt;programming for one can be leveraged to make apps for the other.&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s something Symbian doesn&#039;t really have at all, I don&#039;t think,&lt;br&gt;which is going to be a detraction as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Peter &#8212; those are definitely aspects of the<br />Symbian world that will hold things back, I agree. And someone else<br />mentioned how integrated the iPhone is with the Mac OS, so that<br />programming for one can be leveraged to make apps for the other.<br />That&#39;s something Symbian doesn&#39;t really have at all, I don&#39;t think,<br />which is going to be a detraction as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cranstone</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-374255</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cranstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2509#comment-374255</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; it is going to draw developers in just because of its sheer mass and size. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope. Not necessarily. The key for developers hearts and minds center around a couple of things - is it cool, is it hard to program (and thirdly - can I make money).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Symbian phones are not cool, they are bloody hard to program (multiple platforms and other integration issues) plus right now how do I make money? What&#039;s the killer app?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody knows. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; it is going to draw developers in just because of its sheer mass and size. </p>
<p>Nope. Not necessarily. The key for developers hearts and minds center around a couple of things &#8211; is it cool, is it hard to program (and thirdly &#8211; can I make money).</p>
<p>Symbian phones are not cool, they are bloody hard to program (multiple platforms and other integration issues) plus right now how do I make money? What&#39;s the killer app?</p>
<p>Nobody knows. </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-374254</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2509#comment-374254</guid>
		<description>Those are both good points.  The upgrade cycle is definitely shorter&lt;br&gt;(and easier) when it comes to a phone compared to a desktop or laptop&lt;br&gt;-- and I think you&#039;re also right that Apple made a smart move by&lt;br&gt;effectively tying the iPhone and the existing Apple developer base&lt;br&gt;together like that. Speeds up the process of development, and lowers&lt;br&gt;the cost as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are both good points.  The upgrade cycle is definitely shorter<br />(and easier) when it comes to a phone compared to a desktop or laptop<br />&#8211; and I think you&#39;re also right that Apple made a smart move by<br />effectively tying the iPhone and the existing Apple developer base<br />together like that. Speeds up the process of development, and lowers<br />the cost as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seemsArtless</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-374253</link>
		<dc:creator>seemsArtless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2509#comment-374253</guid>
		<description>I agree that the sheer number of smart phones using a given OS is very relevant in the short to mid term, but moving forward it will be ease-of-development that will make or break things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know how often people around the world upgrade their phones - every 24 months perhaps on average? If so, the existing user base is a real moving target, and doesn&#039;t really have that much invested in remaining with their existing OS when it is time to get a new phone. Changing to a new OS on a phone is way easier than changing OS on a desktop/laptop computer, and way cheaper than replacing all your DVDs with the latest and greatest technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So when it is time to replace an old phone people will go with the snazziest looking phone with the most applications they think they&#039;ll need. So the faster developers can create/clone those apps the more successful they&#039;ll be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure the iPhone is pretty and has an interesting UI, but arguably the best thing Apple did was base iPhone development on existing OS X development -- they&#039;ve lowered the bar for developers that already develop in OS X which got the momentum going early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the sheer number of smart phones using a given OS is very relevant in the short to mid term, but moving forward it will be ease-of-development that will make or break things.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know how often people around the world upgrade their phones &#8211; every 24 months perhaps on average? If so, the existing user base is a real moving target, and doesn&#39;t really have that much invested in remaining with their existing OS when it is time to get a new phone. Changing to a new OS on a phone is way easier than changing OS on a desktop/laptop computer, and way cheaper than replacing all your DVDs with the latest and greatest technology.</p>
<p>So when it is time to replace an old phone people will go with the snazziest looking phone with the most applications they think they&#39;ll need. So the faster developers can create/clone those apps the more successful they&#39;ll be.</p>
<p>Sure the iPhone is pretty and has an interesting UI, but arguably the best thing Apple did was base iPhone development on existing OS X development &#8212; they&#39;ve lowered the bar for developers that already develop in OS X which got the momentum going early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/24/symbian-android-for-the-rest-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-342562</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2509#comment-342562</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Peter -- those are definitely aspects of the&lt;br&gt;Symbian world that will hold things back, I agree. And someone else&lt;br&gt;mentioned how integrated the iPhone is with the Mac OS, so that&lt;br&gt;programming for one can be leveraged to make apps for the other.&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s something Symbian doesn&#039;t really have at all, I don&#039;t think,&lt;br&gt;which is going to be a detraction as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Peter &#8212; those are definitely aspects of the<br />Symbian world that will hold things back, I agree. And someone else<br />mentioned how integrated the iPhone is with the Mac OS, so that<br />programming for one can be leveraged to make apps for the other.<br />That&#39;s something Symbian doesn&#39;t really have at all, I don&#39;t think,<br />which is going to be a detraction as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

