<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Associated Press: In a hole, still digging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-340917</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2492#comment-340917</guid>
		<description>Totally agree -- it seems like a foot-shooting type of effort, in a lot of ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree &#8212; it seems like a foot-shooting type of effort, in a lot of ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampressman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-340916</link>
		<dc:creator>ampressman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2492#comment-340916</guid>
		<description>Forget about the legal issue, for a sec. From a strategic point of view, in the context of a print newspaper industry that is absolutely dying and putting the AP under all kinds of financial pressure, isn&#39;t it extra bizarre that they don&#39;t see this free promotion of their content with links back to their web site as beneficial?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget about the legal issue, for a sec. From a strategic point of view, in the context of a print newspaper industry that is absolutely dying and putting the AP under all kinds of financial pressure, isn&#39;t it extra bizarre that they don&#39;t see this free promotion of their content with links back to their web site as beneficial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-340915</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2492#comment-340915</guid>
		<description>Contrarian as always, Paul  :-)  And I would agree, provided there&#39;s a&lt;br&gt;genuine issue of competition or injury to their ability to sell the&lt;br&gt;content.  But do you really think that&#39;s the case with something like&lt;br&gt;the Drudge Retort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrarian as always, Paul  :-)  And I would agree, provided there&#39;s a<br />genuine issue of competition or injury to their ability to sell the<br />content.  But do you really think that&#39;s the case with something like<br />the Drudge Retort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kedrosky</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/16/associated-press-in-a-hole-still-digging/#comment-340914</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kedrosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2492#comment-340914</guid>
		<description>Not to be all Nick Carr-ish about this, but I&#39;m totally fine with AP&#39;s decision. It&#39;s their content, and they should feel free to coop it up however they see fit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do I think it&#39;s smart though? No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be all Nick Carr-ish about this, but I&#39;m totally fine with AP&#39;s decision. It&#39;s their content, and they should feel free to coop it up however they see fit. </p>
<p>Do I think it&#39;s smart though? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
