<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ballmer on papers: Wrong, as usual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Deathwatch for Newspapers is Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-338505</link>
		<dc:creator>A Deathwatch for Newspapers is Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2470#comment-338505</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram, who is closer that any of us in this discussion as he works in the trenches, doesnâ€™t see newspapers dying any time soon. People still listen to the radio, donâ€™t they? Many of them listen to talk shows, and â€œradio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram, who is closer that any of us in this discussion as he works in the trenches, doesnâ€™t see newspapers dying any time soon. People still listen to the radio, donâ€™t they? Many of them listen to talk shows, and â€œradio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspapers are dying. &#171; mattroberts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-338242</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspapers are dying. &#171; mattroberts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2470#comment-338242</guid>
		<description>[...] of course riled up a few people still working for the Newspapers. With Mathew Ingram pointing out that there will be papers for the foreseeable future. I fundamentally agree with Mat. But I have to ask the question of what kind of papers will they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of course riled up a few people still working for the Newspapers. With Mathew Ingram pointing out that there will be papers for the foreseeable future. I fundamentally agree with Mat. But I have to ask the question of what kind of papers will they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidusher</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-375002</link>
		<dc:creator>davidusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2470#comment-375002</guid>
		<description>i know what you mean, but what i think he&#039;s saying is that they will have disappeared enough to be a real niche and not part of the true metrics of the business. vinyl is a niche that is still around but its such a small part of the metrics of the music business overall i think its fair to say its not really significant. or its all but disappeared:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know what you mean, but what i think he&#39;s saying is that they will have disappeared enough to be a real niche and not part of the true metrics of the business. vinyl is a niche that is still around but its such a small part of the metrics of the music business overall i think its fair to say its not really significant. or its all but disappeared:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-375001</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2470#comment-375001</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, David -- and as I said, I&#039;m not arguing about the&lt;br&gt;trend itself.  But I think it&#039;s just hyperbole to say that newspapers&lt;br&gt;will completely disappear in 10 years, or even 14.  As you said, there&lt;br&gt;are still people who like vinyl, and still people who listen to the&lt;br&gt;radio, and there will still be people who like to hold paper in their&lt;br&gt;hands -- just not as many as there were before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, David &#8212; and as I said, I&#39;m not arguing about the<br />trend itself.  But I think it&#39;s just hyperbole to say that newspapers<br />will completely disappear in 10 years, or even 14.  As you said, there<br />are still people who like vinyl, and still people who listen to the<br />radio, and there will still be people who like to hold paper in their<br />hands &#8212; just not as many as there were before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidusher</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/06/06/ballmer-on-papers-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-375000</link>
		<dc:creator>davidusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2470#comment-375000</guid>
		<description>hey mathew&lt;br&gt;i think i fall on his side with this. 14 years is a lifetime these days with tech and information. it took less that that to go from vinyl to cd. less than that to go from cd to digital (we are still in the middle of it). with the right reader (the ireader) married to the environmental concerns and i think its possible. some people with still want paper just like some still want that vinyl:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey mathew<br />i think i fall on his side with this. 14 years is a lifetime these days with tech and information. it took less that that to go from vinyl to cd. less than that to go from cd to digital (we are still in the middle of it). with the right reader (the ireader) married to the environmental concerns and i think its possible. some people with still want paper just like some still want that vinyl:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

