<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook blocks Google, for your own good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Artur</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/#comment-340120</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2425#comment-340120</guid>
		<description>I disagree. I have a lot of data in Google databases. In the gnotebook, gmail, gcheckout. And I believe they should have some competitors to:&lt;br&gt;- not have ALL my data ;-)&lt;br&gt;- improve their products&lt;br&gt;- simply give me (even illusionary) choice between them and competitive solutions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. I have a lot of data in Google databases. In the gnotebook, gmail, gcheckout. And I believe they should have some competitors to:<br />- not have ALL my data ;-)<br />- improve their products<br />- simply give me (even illusionary) choice between them and competitive solutions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/#comment-340119</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2425#comment-340119</guid>
		<description>I support Facebook on this one, as long as they can work the issue out with Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can they support user privacy if, in the name of openness, they allow any third party complete access to your data?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#39;re trying to strike a balance, to find a way to protect user privacy while making data portable. Give them a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support Facebook on this one, as long as they can work the issue out with Google.</p>
<p>How can they support user privacy if, in the name of openness, they allow any third party complete access to your data?</p>
<p>They&#39;re trying to strike a balance, to find a way to protect user privacy while making data portable. Give them a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antje wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/#comment-340118</link>
		<dc:creator>antje wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2425#comment-340118</guid>
		<description>As a developer, I can totally understand the desire to keep a walled garden because of privacy and control. As working for a business with users who give up their time, their content, their connections -  I can totally see why wanting to keep them in the fold is important and doing your best to bar them from being harassed. As a consumer, I am 100% about not re-entering my data, and going for standarisation, but not sure WHO I want or even trust to "guard" my data. At the end of the day, these sites are nothing without their users. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a messy smorgasboard of conflicting feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a developer, I can totally understand the desire to keep a walled garden because of privacy and control. As working for a business with users who give up their time, their content, their connections -  I can totally see why wanting to keep them in the fold is important and doing your best to bar them from being harassed. As a consumer, I am 100% about not re-entering my data, and going for standarisation, but not sure WHO I want or even trust to &#8220;guard&#8221; my data. At the end of the day, these sites are nothing without their users. </p>
<p>What a messy smorgasboard of conflicting feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddyhcraig</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/#comment-340117</link>
		<dc:creator>teddyhcraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2425#comment-340117</guid>
		<description>Iron website giants...&lt;br&gt;Google vs Facebook...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todays secret ingredient: The end user!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let the battle begin!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end, we control them, by voting with our presence of lack thereof...&lt;br&gt;And all the really smart people in positions of power know that and ask in such a way as to show they know that! The fools don&#39;t and are punished!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron website giants&#8230;<br />Google vs Facebook&#8230;</p>
<p>Todays secret ingredient: The end user!</p>
<p>Let the battle begin!</p>
<p>In the end, we control them, by voting with our presence of lack thereof&#8230;<br />And all the really smart people in positions of power know that and ask in such a way as to show they know that! The fools don&#39;t and are punished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Heisler</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/facebook-blocks-google-for-your-own-good/#comment-340116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Heisler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2425#comment-340116</guid>
		<description>You&#39;re right on the money, Matthew. Nothing could be less about privacy than Facebook&#39;s decision to protect its membership base.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#39;s clear that Facebook wants to keep their members inside their garden walls. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Facebook is building a moat around its castle to keep the search giant out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear Google, Facebook&#39;s Just Not That Into You&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080516-110559"&gt;http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080516-1...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right on the money, Matthew. Nothing could be less about privacy than Facebook&#39;s decision to protect its membership base.</p>
<p>It&#39;s clear that Facebook wants to keep their members inside their garden walls. </p>
<p>Facebook is building a moat around its castle to keep the search giant out.</p>
<p>Dear Google, Facebook&#39;s Just Not That Into You<br /><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080516-110559"></a><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080516-1.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080516-1..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
