<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ars Technica snapped up by Conde Nast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: financial analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/comment-page-1/#comment-344081</link>
		<dc:creator>financial analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2427#comment-344081</guid>
		<description>t has been making inroads into digital publishing, including the purchase of Wired (for about $25-million) last year</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t has been making inroads into digital publishing, including the purchase of Wired (for about $25-million) last year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Matan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/comment-page-1/#comment-342703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Matan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2427#comment-342703</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been an Ars member since &#039;99. Although the news side of things is very well done, the forums are where it&#039;s at (and seemingly where a lot of the current editors have been tapped from). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over the past year or two, they&#039;ve done a really good job on getting onto Slashdot and Google News with their well written articles, which presumably added a lot of value/eyeballs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d imagine that the forums, the root of the community, don&#039;t create much ad revenue (and they might lose a lot of their for-pay subs and for-pay premium subbers). But it probably could if they decided to go with annoying in-your-face adverts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only time will tell, here&#039;s to another good 8.5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been an Ars member since &#39;99. Although the news side of things is very well done, the forums are where it&#39;s at (and seemingly where a lot of the current editors have been tapped from). </p>
<p>Over the past year or two, they&#39;ve done a really good job on getting onto Slashdot and Google News with their well written articles, which presumably added a lot of value/eyeballs. </p>
<p>I&#39;d imagine that the forums, the root of the community, don&#39;t create much ad revenue (and they might lose a lot of their for-pay subs and for-pay premium subbers). But it probably could if they decided to go with annoying in-your-face adverts. </p>
<p>Only time will tell, here&#39;s to another good 8.5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sevin malony</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/comment-page-1/#comment-342702</link>
		<dc:creator>sevin malony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2427#comment-342702</guid>
		<description>saw the 24/7 &quot;analysis&quot;. assuming it&#039;s right - and i very much doubt those numbers reflect reality - then, folk,s we&#039;re back to the bubblicious days. but hey, if ars or any of these other sites can find a buyer, more power to them. nothing wrong with being greedy if some dope is begging to give you their money. but c&#039;mon, we&#039;ve been here before. or has everyone in the world forgotten the &quot;battle for eyeballs&quot; back a few years ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anyway, pass the bong and inhale deeply. and the band played on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw the 24/7 &#8220;analysis&#8221;. assuming it&#39;s right &#8211; and i very much doubt those numbers reflect reality &#8211; then, folk,s we&#39;re back to the bubblicious days. but hey, if ars or any of these other sites can find a buyer, more power to them. nothing wrong with being greedy if some dope is begging to give you their money. but c&#39;mon, we&#39;ve been here before. or has everyone in the world forgotten the &#8220;battle for eyeballs&#8221; back a few years ago. </p>
<p>anyway, pass the bong and inhale deeply. and the band played on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/comment-page-1/#comment-342701</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2427#comment-342701</guid>
		<description>Agree with Lucas -- that was my first thought: $36 CPM seems awfully high. Perhaps they get it for a limited amount of inventory but can&#039;t imagine it&#039;s across -the-board. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also agree with Mathew that Ars could be a good fit for Conde -- they&#039;re putting together a pretty interesting digital portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Lucas &#8212; that was my first thought: $36 CPM seems awfully high. Perhaps they get it for a limited amount of inventory but can&#39;t imagine it&#39;s across -the-board. </p>
<p>Also agree with Mathew that Ars could be a good fit for Conde &#8212; they&#39;re putting together a pretty interesting digital portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/16/ars-technica-snapped-up-by-conde-nast/comment-page-1/#comment-342700</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2427#comment-342700</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair point, Lucas. Those are pretty high CPMs for a site like&lt;br&gt;Ars, and assuming they get that for every page view is probably&lt;br&gt;overstating things. That said, however, I looked at TechCrunch and saw&lt;br&gt;that Ars has about four times as many page views, and I had seen an&lt;br&gt;estimate somewhere that TC was making about $600,000 a month, so I&lt;br&gt;thought I was in the right ballpark revenue-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a fair point, Lucas. Those are pretty high CPMs for a site like<br />Ars, and assuming they get that for every page view is probably<br />overstating things. That said, however, I looked at TechCrunch and saw<br />that Ars has about four times as many page views, and I had seen an<br />estimate somewhere that TC was making about $600,000 a month, so I<br />thought I was in the right ballpark revenue-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
