<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel: Please don&#8217;t watch our movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watch Movies Online</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/#comment-344046</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Movies Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2375#comment-344046</guid>
		<description>the whole process began with a phone call to the number listed on the official Iron Man movie website for “group sales</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole process began with a phone call to the number listed on the official Iron Man movie website for “group sales</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianbetteridge</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/#comment-341051</link>
		<dc:creator>ianbetteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2375#comment-341051</guid>
		<description>Yes - while they may not be in the wrong legally, it&#39;s such a bad PR move that you wonder who authorised it. Certainly, if anyone in their PR or marketing teams was consulted prior to this email going out, they shouldn&#39;t be working at the company for much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - while they may not be in the wrong legally, it&#39;s such a bad PR move that you wonder who authorised it. Certainly, if anyone in their PR or marketing teams was consulted prior to this email going out, they shouldn&#39;t be working at the company for much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8k99</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/#comment-341052</link>
		<dc:creator>n8k99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2375#comment-341052</guid>
		<description>...........and after a decade of working in the biz- that&#39;s exactly why i do not go to the cinema anymore. stupid pricks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..and after a decade of working in the biz- that&#39;s exactly why i do not go to the cinema anymore. stupid pricks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/#comment-341050</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2375#comment-341050</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Calvin -- notice that I didn&#39;t say that Marvel&lt;br&gt;was wrong.  I just said they were dumb.  What is to be gained by&lt;br&gt;sending C&#038;D letters?  Nothing but negative publicity.  I&#39;m sure they&lt;br&gt;could have worked something out that satisifed whatever legal&lt;br&gt;requirements they are concerned about.  Instead, they look like&lt;br&gt;morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Calvin &#8212; notice that I didn&#39;t say that Marvel<br />was wrong.  I just said they were dumb.  What is to be gained by<br />sending C&#038;D letters?  Nothing but negative publicity.  I&#39;m sure they<br />could have worked something out that satisifed whatever legal<br />requirements they are concerned about.  Instead, they look like<br />morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/29/marvel-please-dont-watch-our-movie/#comment-341049</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2375#comment-341049</guid>
		<description>well, you can criticize them from a distance and label them as PR naifs, but they are well within their rights to dispose of their IP in any manner they wish. whether you or mike arrington are displeased really isn&#39;t relevant to the law. if push comes to shove, marvel is in the right. but arrington wins too: he got the PR he was looking for. you wrote about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, you can criticize them from a distance and label them as PR naifs, but they are well within their rights to dispose of their IP in any manner they wish. whether you or mike arrington are displeased really isn&#39;t relevant to the law. if push comes to shove, marvel is in the right. but arrington wins too: he got the PR he was looking for. you wrote about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
