<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of blogs, accuracy and editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-337648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2343#comment-337648</guid>
		<description>@Matt: well, obviously he needs to sleep -- but he&#039;s not the only one who works at TechCrunch, is he?  And the post still hasn&#039;t been updated. I assume he&#039;s woken up by now.

@knackered: I&#039;m not suggesting that wire services shoot first and ask questions later. I&#039;m just saying that getting things onto the wire first is more important than just about anything, and if you have worked at a wire service or know someone who has, you know what I&#039;m talking about. 

The fact is that mistakes happen all the time -- not the &quot;I made up a story&quot; kind of mistakes, but spelling errors, mis-attributions, etc., and in some cases misunderstandings. It&#039;s a factor of trying to be first. I&#039;m not saying blogs and wire services are identical, I&#039;m just saying there are similarities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: well, obviously he needs to sleep &#8212; but he&#8217;s not the only one who works at TechCrunch, is he?  And the post still hasn&#8217;t been updated. I assume he&#8217;s woken up by now.</p>
<p>@knackered: I&#8217;m not suggesting that wire services shoot first and ask questions later. I&#8217;m just saying that getting things onto the wire first is more important than just about anything, and if you have worked at a wire service or know someone who has, you know what I&#8217;m talking about. </p>
<p>The fact is that mistakes happen all the time &#8212; not the &#8220;I made up a story&#8221; kind of mistakes, but spelling errors, mis-attributions, etc., and in some cases misunderstandings. It&#8217;s a factor of trying to be first. I&#8217;m not saying blogs and wire services are identical, I&#8217;m just saying there are similarities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knackeredhack</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-337643</link>
		<dc:creator>knackeredhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2343#comment-337643</guid>
		<description>Mathew, I beg to differ with you about wire services. Although standards of accuracy and transparency may vary from wire service to wire service at the margin, I think it is not fair to say that they shoot first and ask questions later. At the core of the Reuters business, for example, are financial market readers where the difference between being right and wrong can cost millions in a nano-second. 

While news editors at other media outlets surely need to be alerted to wire service mistakes as quickly as possible, I think you would find that an angry call from a major investment bank that has lost money as a result of a reporting inaccuracy will focus the mind a lot more quickly than one from another journalist because the mistake is generally more easily reversible for the latter.  So there is a premium on accuracy, despite the intense competitive pressure to be first.  

There are other arguments to be had about wire services and the way their services are produced and consumed in the markets, but in my experience they are not careless in the quest for speed.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew, I beg to differ with you about wire services. Although standards of accuracy and transparency may vary from wire service to wire service at the margin, I think it is not fair to say that they shoot first and ask questions later. At the core of the Reuters business, for example, are financial market readers where the difference between being right and wrong can cost millions in a nano-second. </p>
<p>While news editors at other media outlets surely need to be alerted to wire service mistakes as quickly as possible, I think you would find that an angry call from a major investment bank that has lost money as a result of a reporting inaccuracy will focus the mind a lot more quickly than one from another journalist because the mistake is generally more easily reversible for the latter.  So there is a premium on accuracy, despite the intense competitive pressure to be first.  </p>
<p>There are other arguments to be had about wire services and the way their services are produced and consumed in the markets, but in my experience they are not careless in the quest for speed.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Of blogs, accuracy and editors.&#8221; Or: About Twitter, TechCrunch, and owning a mistake &#8212; 1FPS &#124; Everything Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-337610</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Of blogs, accuracy and editors.&#8221; Or: About Twitter, TechCrunch, and owning a mistake &#8212; 1FPS &#124; Everything Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2343#comment-337610</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Wingram on TechCrunch&#8217;s baselessâ€”and, as it turns out, completely falseâ€”claim that Twitter was testing ads: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Wingram on TechCrunch&#8217;s baselessâ€”and, as it turns out, completely falseâ€”claim that Twitter was testing ads: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-337609</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2343#comment-337609</guid>
		<description>So was Duncan to wake up at 3am and make an update to his TC post - since he&#039;s in Australia and all?

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was Duncan to wake up at 3am and make an update to his TC post &#8211; since he&#8217;s in Australia and all?</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/15/of-blogs-accuracy-and-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-337607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2343#comment-337607</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s true to say that right and wrong don&#039;t matter, Allen -- even for Duncan :-) I think it&#039;s probably fair to say that being right is only *one* of the things that matter. And frankly, when it comes right down to it, it&#039;s only part of the equation with traditional media as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s true to say that right and wrong don&#8217;t matter, Allen &#8212; even for Duncan :-) I think it&#8217;s probably fair to say that being right is only *one* of the things that matter. And frankly, when it comes right down to it, it&#8217;s only part of the equation with traditional media as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
