Comments on: Shyftr changes its tune on shared feeds http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:17:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: The Shyftr Saga : The Blog Herald http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-337586 The Shyftr Saga : The Blog Herald Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:58:02 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2337#comment-337586 [...] in turn, seemed to appease many of the critics of the site, including Mathew Ingram, and seemed to put the issue largely at [...] [...] in turn, seemed to appease many of the critics of the site, including Mathew Ingram, and seemed to put the issue largely at [...]

]]> By: Louis Gray http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-374198 Louis Gray Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:25 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2337#comment-374198 The negativity over Shyftr has been surprising to me, but now that we're here, they'll have to keep being open and transparent. It's amazing how many folks took what should be seen as a great development in RSS feed readers and saw it as an attack on their livelihood or copyright. When it boils down to it, you have a pair of guys working hard on their dream project who just got shot down by 90% of folks who never have actually used the service. I'm glad they listened and changed the product, but it hurts the users who __should__ have full access to the feeds and comments, in my opinion.<br><br>It's a responsibility for us bloggers to be aware of and engage with the new forums for discussion. Those that don't will be passed up by those of us who do. The negativity over Shyftr has been surprising to me, but now that we're here, they'll have to keep being open and transparent. It's amazing how many folks took what should be seen as a great development in RSS feed readers and saw it as an attack on their livelihood or copyright. When it boils down to it, you have a pair of guys working hard on their dream project who just got shot down by 90% of folks who never have actually used the service. I'm glad they listened and changed the product, but it hurts the users who __should__ have full access to the feeds and comments, in my opinion.

It's a responsibility for us bloggers to be aware of and engage with the new forums for discussion. Those that don't will be passed up by those of us who do.

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-374197 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:02:06 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2337#comment-374197 I am glad that they changed their policy as quickly as they did, but it shows to me that they did not think their business model all the way through. Yes, they are listening, but they are walking into a minefield with this and didn't bother getting a map.<br><br>They're just hoping that the explosions don't hurt too bad... I am glad that they changed their policy as quickly as they did, but it shows to me that they did not think their business model all the way through. Yes, they are listening, but they are walking into a minefield with this and didn't bother getting a map.

They're just hoping that the explosions don't hurt too bad…

]]> By: Louis Gray http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-341970 Louis Gray Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:43:25 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2337#comment-341970 The negativity over Shyftr has been surprising to me, but now that we're here, they'll have to keep being open and transparent. It's amazing how many folks took what should be seen as a great development in RSS feed readers and saw it as an attack on their livelihood or copyright. When it boils down to it, you have a pair of guys working hard on their dream project who just got shot down by 90% of folks who never have actually used the service. I'm glad they listened and changed the product, but it hurts the users who __should__ have full access to the feeds and comments, in my opinion.<br><br>It's a responsibility for us bloggers to be aware of and engage with the new forums for discussion. Those that don't will be passed up by those of us who do. The negativity over Shyftr has been surprising to me, but now that we're here, they'll have to keep being open and transparent. It's amazing how many folks took what should be seen as a great development in RSS feed readers and saw it as an attack on their livelihood or copyright. When it boils down to it, you have a pair of guys working hard on their dream project who just got shot down by 90% of folks who never have actually used the service. I'm glad they listened and changed the product, but it hurts the users who __should__ have full access to the feeds and comments, in my opinion.

It's a responsibility for us bloggers to be aware of and engage with the new forums for discussion. Those that don't will be passed up by those of us who do.

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/13/shyftr-changes-its-tune-on-shared-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-341969 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:02:06 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2337#comment-341969 I am glad that they changed their policy as quickly as they did, but it shows to me that they did not think their business model all the way through. Yes, they are listening, but they are walking into a minefield with this and didn't bother getting a map.<br><br>They're just hoping that the explosions don't hurt too bad... I am glad that they changed their policy as quickly as they did, but it shows to me that they did not think their business model all the way through. Yes, they are listening, but they are walking into a minefield with this and didn't bother getting a map.

They're just hoping that the explosions don't hurt too bad…

]]>