Comments on: Seesmic and Twhirl: Why all the fuss? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:09:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Roger Kondrat http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/comment-page-1/#comment-373986 Roger Kondrat Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:12:56 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2314#comment-373986 @Andrew I do this to Twitter too. For me Twitter is just a vehicle, but I think Matt's point is that he wasn't being deceptive and / or pushy. I just have an auto twitter in my WP and it automatically pushes out the articles. I don't try to make them any more or less than what they are and my followers know to expect them and if they so desire to read them.<br><br>@Matt I agree with your attitude but in a hawkish environment such as the online media world is you need hardcore titles to get attention that being said making it personal and being salacious is not the way to go. <br><br>Principled and disciplined is the way forward if we want to get respect and grow our readership. @Andrew I do this to Twitter too. For me Twitter is just a vehicle, but I think Matt's point is that he wasn't being deceptive and / or pushy. I just have an auto twitter in my WP and it automatically pushes out the articles. I don't try to make them any more or less than what they are and my followers know to expect them and if they so desire to read them.

@Matt I agree with your attitude but in a hawkish environment such as the online media world is you need hardcore titles to get attention that being said making it personal and being salacious is not the way to go.

Principled and disciplined is the way forward if we want to get respect and grow our readership.

]]> By: Roger Kondrat http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/comment-page-1/#comment-373985 Roger Kondrat Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:08:06 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2314#comment-373985 @Luca@Mat, totally agree, before the web we worried about companies like TimeWarner controlling everything we read and now we have so many different websites jockeying for readers that they end up in essence writing about the same material. <br><br>More is not always better I guess. Is the content today journalism? It certainly is not investigative or introspective.<br><br>@Matt can you email me as I want to do a podcast with you. Should be easy to get in touch with me as I am registered with Disqus.<br><br>Cheers to all<br>Roger @Luca@Mat, totally agree, before the web we worried about companies like TimeWarner controlling everything we read and now we have so many different websites jockeying for readers that they end up in essence writing about the same material.

More is not always better I guess. Is the content today journalism? It certainly is not investigative or introspective.

@Matt can you email me as I want to do a podcast with you. Should be easy to get in touch with me as I am registered with Disqus.

Cheers to all
Roger

]]> By: Roger Kondrat http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/comment-page-1/#comment-341489 Roger Kondrat Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:12:56 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2314#comment-341489 @Andrew I do this to Twitter too. For me Twitter is just a vehicle, but I think Matt's point is that he wasn't being deceptive and / or pushy. I just have an auto twitter in my WP and it automatically pushes out the articles. I don't try to make them any more or less than what they are and my followers know to expect them and if they so desire to read them.<br><br>@Matt I agree with your attitude but in a hawkish environment such as the online media world is you need hardcore titles to get attention that being said making it personal and being salacious is not the way to go. <br><br>Principled and disciplined is the way forward if we want to get respect and grow our readership. @Andrew I do this to Twitter too. For me Twitter is just a vehicle, but I think Matt's point is that he wasn't being deceptive and / or pushy. I just have an auto twitter in my WP and it automatically pushes out the articles. I don't try to make them any more or less than what they are and my followers know to expect them and if they so desire to read them.

@Matt I agree with your attitude but in a hawkish environment such as the online media world is you need hardcore titles to get attention that being said making it personal and being salacious is not the way to go.

Principled and disciplined is the way forward if we want to get respect and grow our readership.

]]> By: Roger Kondrat http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/comment-page-1/#comment-341482 Roger Kondrat Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:08:06 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2314#comment-341482 @Luca@Mat, totally agree, before the web we worried about companies like TimeWarner controlling everything we read and now we have so many different websites jockeying for readers that they end up in essence writing about the same material. <br><br>More is not always better I guess. Is the content today journalism? It certainly is not investigative or introspective.<br><br>@Matt can you email me as I want to do a podcast with you. Should be easy to get in touch with me as I am registered with Disqus.<br><br>Cheers to all<br>Roger @Luca@Mat, totally agree, before the web we worried about companies like TimeWarner controlling everything we read and now we have so many different websites jockeying for readers that they end up in essence writing about the same material.

More is not always better I guess. Is the content today journalism? It certainly is not investigative or introspective.

@Matt can you email me as I want to do a podcast with you. Should be easy to get in touch with me as I am registered with Disqus.

Cheers to all
Roger

]]> By: Marshall is right, Twhirl and Seesmic do give us a glimpse into the future of communications http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/04/seesmic-and-twhirl-why-all-the-fuss/comment-page-1/#comment-337475 Marshall is right, Twhirl and Seesmic do give us a glimpse into the future of communications Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:04:07 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2314#comment-337475 [...] Seesmic and Twhirl: Why all the fuss? - mathewingram.com/work [...] [...] Seesmic and Twhirl: Why all the fuss? – mathewingram.com/work [...]

]]>