<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Divx and Stage6: Chock full of fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VICER0Y</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-374742</link>
		<dc:creator>VICER0Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/#comment-374742</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://Stage6.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stage6.com&lt;/a&gt; is gone but &lt;a href=&quot;http://stage6.999.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stage6.999.org&lt;/a&gt; is here&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has the same look as stage6 with channels etc. and a great community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://Stage6.com" rel="nofollow">Stage6.com</a> is gone but <a href="http://stage6.999.org" rel="nofollow">stage6.999.org</a> is here</p>
<p>It has the same look as stage6 with channels etc. and a great community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VICER0Y</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342709</link>
		<dc:creator>VICER0Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/#comment-342709</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://Stage6.com&quot;&gt;Stage6.com&lt;/a&gt; is gone but &lt;a href=&quot;http://stage6.999.org&quot;&gt;stage6.999.org&lt;/a&gt; is here&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has the same look as stage6 with channels etc. and a great community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://Stage6.com">Stage6.com</a> is gone but <a href="http://stage6.999.org">stage6.999.org</a> is here</p>
<p>It has the same look as stage6 with channels etc. and a great community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belive Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342708</link>
		<dc:creator>Belive Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/#comment-342708</guid>
		<description>Stage6 close is just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stage6 close is just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Parkatti</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342707</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Parkatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/26/divx-and-stage6-chock-full-of-fail/#comment-342707</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I couldn&#039;t believe this story when I read it on TechCrunch... is this what happens when startups try to get too &#039;corporatized&#039; and listen to board strategy instead of follow the wisdom of the founders?  I think that boards should leave the fundamental business direction to the troops on the ground -- in the limited format of a board meeting, how in the world can they possibly understand either the technology involved or the exploitable business need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I couldn&#39;t believe this story when I read it on TechCrunch&#8230; is this what happens when startups try to get too &#39;corporatized&#39; and listen to board strategy instead of follow the wisdom of the founders?  I think that boards should leave the fundamental business direction to the troops on the ground &#8212; in the limited format of a board meeting, how in the world can they possibly understand either the technology involved or the exploitable business need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
