<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Careful with that data, Eugene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: safex982</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342841</link>
		<dc:creator>safex982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342841</guid>
		<description>Well, i like this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i like this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342840</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342840</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Leigh.  That certainly tends to support my own hypothesis --&lt;br&gt;which is, of course, based on virtually no facts and mostly a lot of&lt;br&gt;conjecture and anecdotal evidence.   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Leigh.  That certainly tends to support my own hypothesis &#8211;<br />which is, of course, based on virtually no facts and mostly a lot of<br />conjecture and anecdotal evidence.   :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342839</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342839</guid>
		<description>nice one Mathew.  You&#39;ll enjoy this.  Found via Federman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&#038;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124&#038;ct=1"&gt;http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?requ...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one Mathew.  You&#39;ll enjoy this.  Found via Federman</p>
<p><a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&#038;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124&#038;ct=1"></a><a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?requ.." rel="nofollow">http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?requ..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen stern</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342838</link>
		<dc:creator>allen stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342838</guid>
		<description>I&#39;d argue Equifax is larger than Experian... here is scary... back in my old corporate days, I built a customer/consumer database with about 9-10 million of our customers. Experian came in and said they could matchup name/email to their database and give us 30-40 more points of data on each record in the db from credit info to salary, etc. And we think Beacon is bad :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d argue Equifax is larger than Experian&#8230; here is scary&#8230; back in my old corporate days, I built a customer/consumer database with about 9-10 million of our customers. Experian came in and said they could matchup name/email to their database and give us 30-40 more points of data on each record in the db from credit info to salary, etc. And we think Beacon is bad :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342837</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/16/careful-with-that-data-eugene/#comment-342837</guid>
		<description>I have no doubt that they have lots of purchasing data and demographic&lt;br&gt;profiles from their credit arm -- but how do they know whether people&lt;br&gt;spent more than 500 dollars online or whether they use Google or&lt;br&gt;Yahoo? Do they track people&#39;s behaviour online and watch every site&lt;br&gt;they spend money on? I doubt it. In fact, I&#39;m pretty sure that would&lt;br&gt;be illegal. As far as I can tell, they do surveys. And surveys are&lt;br&gt;notoriously unreliable. They often tend to show whatever you want them&lt;br&gt;to show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt that they have lots of purchasing data and demographic<br />profiles from their credit arm &#8212; but how do they know whether people<br />spent more than 500 dollars online or whether they use Google or<br />Yahoo? Do they track people&#39;s behaviour online and watch every site<br />they spend money on? I doubt it. In fact, I&#39;m pretty sure that would<br />be illegal. As far as I can tell, they do surveys. And surveys are<br />notoriously unreliable. They often tend to show whatever you want them<br />to show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
