http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/comment-page-1/#comment-351498 Sometimes the reporting is more interesting than the story — Shooting at Bubbles Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:27:43 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-351498 [...] MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two is Mathew Ingram’s 9:38 AM post which can be best summarized up Mathew’s one line in the post - But can two sick dogs roped together beat one healthy dog? [...] [...] MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two is Mathew Ingram’s 9:38 AM post which can be best summarized up Mathew’s one line in the post – But can two sick dogs roped together beat one healthy dog? [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/comment-page-1/#comment-336893 Sometimes the reporting is more interesting that the story | WinExtra Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:21:23 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-336893 [...] MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two is Mathew Ingram’s 9:38 AM post which can be best summarized up Mathew’s one line in the post - But can two sick dogs roped together beat one healthy dog? [...] [...] MSFT and YHOO: Then there were two is Mathew Ingram’s 9:38 AM post which can be best summarized up Mathew’s one line in the post – But can two sick dogs roped together beat one healthy dog? [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/comment-page-1/#comment-374002 mathewi Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:10:01 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-374002 Great minds think alike, Stan :-) Great minds think alike, Stan :-)

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/comment-page-1/#comment-374001 Stan_Schroeder Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:48:48 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-374001 Heh. Surprisingly similar to my blog post, although I haven't read your coverage before. I agree, this is desperation; Yahoo pretty much has no choice but to accept. Heh. Surprisingly similar to my blog post, although I haven't read your coverage before. I agree, this is desperation; Yahoo pretty much has no choice but to accept.

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/comment-page-1/#comment-336887 Microsoft Acquiring Yahoo: Is This A Good Thing? « SmoothSpan Blog Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:19:40 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/01/msft-and-yhoo-then-there-were-two/#comment-336887 [...] Mathew Ingram wonders whether two sick dogs roped together can beat one healthy dog.  They won’t beat Google.  If they’re smart, they’ll focus on using all that traffic for something besides a frontal assault on search.  [...] [...] Mathew Ingram wonders whether two sick dogs roped together can beat one healthy dog.  They won’t beat Google.  If they’re smart, they’ll focus on using all that traffic for something besides a frontal assault on search.  [...]

]]>