Comments on: Influence isn’t all-or-nothing http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Molly Jenson http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-346065 Molly Jenson Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:05:21 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/#comment-346065 There's nothing wrong with Madonna's adopting another child. It's good that she's helping a homeless child to have a family. That child will be loved. Why don't they give her a chance? There's nothing wrong with Madonna's adopting another child. It's good that she's helping a homeless child to have a family. That child will be loved. Why don't they give her a chance?

]]> By: Molly Jenson http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-346064 Molly Jenson Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:02:58 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/#comment-346064 There's nothing wrong with Ladonna's adopting another child. It's good that she's helping a homeless child to have a family. That child will be loved. Why don't they give her a chance? There's nothing wrong with Ladonna's adopting another child. It's good that she's helping a homeless child to have a family. That child will be loved. Why don't they give her a chance?

]]> By: El Mike’s Internet News Blog » Blog Archive » So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren’t Influentials? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-336846 El Mike’s Internet News Blog » Blog Archive » So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren’t Influentials? Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:34:13 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/#comment-336846 [...] that doesn’t mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. As Mathew Ingram astutely notes, what this really means is that rather than targeting a small group of people, you still need to [...] [...] that doesn’t mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. As Mathew Ingram astutely notes, what this really means is that rather than targeting a small group of people, you still need to [...]

]]> By: So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren’t Influentials? | Web Kita -Belajar web http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-336841 So Who Will Spread The Word That There Aren’t Influentials? | Web Kita -Belajar web Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:34:59 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/#comment-336841 [...] that doesn't mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. As Mathew Ingram astutely notes, what this really means is that rather than targeting a small group of people, you still need to [...] [...] that doesn’t mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. As Mathew Ingram astutely notes, what this really means is that rather than targeting a small group of people, you still need to [...]

]]> By: Shyam Kumar http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-341851 Shyam Kumar Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:51:24 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/28/influence-isnt-all-or-nothing/#comment-341851 Good Summary. <br><br>My view: Anyone can be the 'Influential', it's a question of a plethora of not so random characteristics merging in a random manner. <br>In words that make more sense, dont market to the Top 10 or to the Top+Bottom 1000. Market to the Middle class which has potential to go both ways, and hence equal probability of becoming/reaching 'accidental influentials' and of mass marketing as well.<br><br>A very interesting topic no doubt and one that will be, and is being, twisted and turned to no end. <br><br>As they say, " If you speak a lie over and over again, one day you'll believe it's true." or something to that effect.<br>You can already see signs of 'Influentials', accidental or not, influencing misinterpreted and misguided posts.<br><br>Should be fun... Good Summary.

My view: Anyone can be the 'Influential', it's a question of a plethora of not so random characteristics merging in a random manner.
In words that make more sense, dont market to the Top 10 or to the Top+Bottom 1000. Market to the Middle class which has potential to go both ways, and hence equal probability of becoming/reaching 'accidental influentials' and of mass marketing as well.

A very interesting topic no doubt and one that will be, and is being, twisted and turned to no end.

As they say, ” If you speak a lie over and over again, one day you'll believe it's true.” or something to that effect.
You can already see signs of 'Influentials', accidental or not, influencing misinterpreted and misguided posts.

Should be fun…

]]>