<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and Pownce need to merge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/comment-page-1/#comment-374277</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-374277</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree -- I just think it&#039;s too late for Pownce to grab much momentum&lt;br&gt;away from Twitter.  They&#039;re benefiting massively from network effects now --&lt;br&gt;I get four or five people following me a day, and virtually nothing on&lt;br&gt;Pownce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree &#8212; I just think it&#39;s too late for Pownce to grab much momentum<br />away from Twitter.  They&#39;re benefiting massively from network effects now &#8211;<br />I get four or five people following me a day, and virtually nothing on<br />Pownce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/comment-page-1/#comment-374276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-374276</guid>
		<description>Looks like a case when 1 + 1 could equal 3. Interesting concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a case when 1 + 1 could equal 3. Interesting concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/comment-page-1/#comment-374275</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-374275</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on the merging. I&#039;ve been trying to use both today back and forth and it&#039;s tiring. Even with fairly different feature sets/selling points, I think there is only room for one of them to reach mass appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with you on the merging. I&#39;ve been trying to use both today back and forth and it&#39;s tiring. Even with fairly different feature sets/selling points, I think there is only room for one of them to reach mass appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/comment-page-1/#comment-342609</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-342609</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree -- I just think it&#039;s too late for Pownce to grab much momentum&lt;br&gt;away from Twitter.  They&#039;re benefiting massively from network effects now --&lt;br&gt;I get four or five people following me a day, and virtually nothing on&lt;br&gt;Pownce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree &#8212; I just think it&#39;s too late for Pownce to grab much momentum<br />away from Twitter.  They&#39;re benefiting massively from network effects now &#8211;<br />I get four or five people following me a day, and virtually nothing on<br />Pownce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Little, Too Late for Pownce &#124; Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/comment-page-1/#comment-336731</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Little, Too Late for Pownce &#124; Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/22/twitter-and-pownce-need-to-merge/#comment-336731</guid>
		<description>[...] friend, Mathew Ingram, suggests Pownce&#8217;s future could lie in a deal with Twitter that would combine Pownce&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend, Mathew Ingram, suggests Pownce&#8217;s future could lie in a deal with Twitter that would combine Pownce&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
