<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m glad Louis Gray called out Mashable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogs and the attribution dilemma - mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-337914</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs and the attribution dilemma - mathewingram.com/media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comment-337914</guid>
		<description>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first time this sort of thing has come up, obviously. Louis Gray wrote a post about how Mashable was &#8220;stealing the B-list buzz&#8221; by not providing proper attribution to him (Pete Cashmore and other Mashable writers commented on the post), and later posted a follow-up here. In many cases, Mashable puts a small &#8220;via&#8221; link at the bottom of a post, without any other link or attribution. Is that enough? I don&#8217;t really know, but I do know that it&#8217;s becoming more of an issue, and it&#8217;s something that every blogger should be thinking about when they write. I wrote about this before after Louis posted his thoughts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first time this sort of thing has come up, obviously. Louis Gray wrote a post about how Mashable was &#8220;stealing the B-list buzz&#8221; by not providing proper attribution to him (Pete Cashmore and other Mashable writers commented on the post), and later posted a follow-up here. In many cases, Mashable puts a small &#8220;via&#8221; link at the bottom of a post, without any other link or attribution. Is that enough? I don&#8217;t really know, but I do know that it&#8217;s becoming more of an issue, and it&#8217;s something that every blogger should be thinking about when they write. I wrote about this before after Louis posted his thoughts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs and the attribution dilemma &#187; mathewingram.com/work &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-337913</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs and the attribution dilemma &#187; mathewingram.com/work &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comment-337913</guid>
		<description>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first time this sort of thing has come up, obviously. Louis Gray wrote a post about how Mashable was &#8220;stealing the B-list buzz&#8221; by not providing proper attribution to him (Pete Cashmore and other Mashable writers commented on the post), and later posted a follow-up here. In many cases, Mashable puts a small &#8220;via&#8221; link at the bottom of a post, without any other link or attribution. Is that enough? I don&#8217;t really know, but I do know that it&#8217;s becoming more of an issue, and it&#8217;s something that every blogger should be thinking about when they write. I wrote about this before after Louis posted his thoughts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This isn&#8217;t the first time this sort of thing has come up, obviously. Louis Gray wrote a post about how Mashable was &#8220;stealing the B-list buzz&#8221; by not providing proper attribution to him (Pete Cashmore and other Mashable writers commented on the post), and later posted a follow-up here. In many cases, Mashable puts a small &#8220;via&#8221; link at the bottom of a post, without any other link or attribution. Is that enough? I don&#8217;t really know, but I do know that it&#8217;s becoming more of an issue, and it&#8217;s something that every blogger should be thinking about when they write. I wrote about this before after Louis posted his thoughts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget Mashable; It's the Chinese You Should Worry About! &#x2014; The NeoSmart Files</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-336741</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget Mashable; It's the Chinese You Should Worry About! &#x2014; The NeoSmart Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comment-336741</guid>
		<description>[...] the original source on certain stories. Gray&#039;s post spread pretty fast across the blogosphere, with support coming in from all corners of the web. As a result, Mashable updated several stories with proper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original source on certain stories. Gray&#8217;s post spread pretty fast across the blogosphere, with support coming in from all corners of the web. As a result, Mashable updated several stories with proper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenHodson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-373880</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenHodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comment-373880</guid>
		<description>Or how about those one line lead ins to nothing more than a quote fom the linked site and then as the bottom all you get is either the Via or even worse IMO the simple [Link]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boing Boing is notroious for that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or how about those one line lead ins to nothing more than a quote fom the linked site and then as the bottom all you get is either the Via or even worse IMO the simple [Link]</p>
<p>Boing Boing is notroious for that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenHodson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-341955</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenHodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comment-341955</guid>
		<description>Or how about those one line lead ins to nothing more than a quote fom the linked site and then as the bottom all you get is either the Via or even worse IMO the simple [Link]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boing Boing is notroious for that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or how about those one line lead ins to nothing more than a quote fom the linked site and then as the bottom all you get is either the Via or even worse IMO the simple [Link]</p>
<p>Boing Boing is notroious for that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
