<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET on music: Right advice, wrong lessons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianbetteridge</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-373932</link>
		<dc:creator>ianbetteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/#comment-373932</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hookers and coke&quot;? Surely you mean &quot;flowers and candles&quot; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hookers and coke&#8221;? Surely you mean &#8220;flowers and candles&#8221; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianbetteridge</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-340793</link>
		<dc:creator>ianbetteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/#comment-340793</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hookers and coke&quot;? Surely you mean &quot;flowers and candles&quot; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hookers and coke&#8221;? Surely you mean &#8220;flowers and candles&#8221; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Forman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-340797</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Forman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/#comment-340797</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and I agree with most of it. Many different models being talked about but none of them being pursued yet with a vengeance. The record industry re-grouping,pfft! yeah, nothing is impossible but I&#039;d say better chance of a pure marketing company to fill that void in that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Radiohead and Trent neither are saints and yeah I think Trent is the Net savvier of the two. In RH&#039;s case I think they were just throwing crap against the wall and see what would stick more than trying to be revolutionary. What they probably didn&#039;t expect was they&#039;d do better with web pirates and tight-wads(I know being redundant here) coughing up some money which when aggregated will probably pile up higher than cd release. besides who wants stupid cd now that it&#039;s not fresh anymore and it&#039;s all been jacked into people&#039;s IPods for months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trent-no dummy but not a businessman either. The rock star model is dead. These people are an anomaly from previous scarcity proprietary walled model. Not gonna see many of them in a few more years so enjoy it while you can.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also recent posts by Mark Cuban on some ideas and also Lefsetz on RH&#039;s true colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and I agree with most of it. Many different models being talked about but none of them being pursued yet with a vengeance. The record industry re-grouping,pfft! yeah, nothing is impossible but I&#39;d say better chance of a pure marketing company to fill that void in that way.</p>
<p>Radiohead and Trent neither are saints and yeah I think Trent is the Net savvier of the two. In RH&#39;s case I think they were just throwing crap against the wall and see what would stick more than trying to be revolutionary. What they probably didn&#39;t expect was they&#39;d do better with web pirates and tight-wads(I know being redundant here) coughing up some money which when aggregated will probably pile up higher than cd release. besides who wants stupid cd now that it&#39;s not fresh anymore and it&#39;s all been jacked into people&#39;s IPods for months.</p>
<p>Trent-no dummy but not a businessman either. The rock star model is dead. These people are an anomaly from previous scarcity proprietary walled model. Not gonna see many of them in a few more years so enjoy it while you can.</p>
<p>See also recent posts by Mark Cuban on some ideas and also Lefsetz on RH&#39;s true colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maths</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-340796</link>
		<dc:creator>maths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/#comment-340796</guid>
		<description>Matt, agree with you here. As Sandoval has conceded that labels only manage to achieve profitably with roughly 5% or less of their roster, surely something is wrong with the way they manage the rest of it? And this is a business model that we should be aspiring to?&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s time that labels are more discerning in what they want to achieve in a focused manner and also in terms of marketing, be more focused on niches and the Long Tail instead of a scattergun approach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, agree with you here. As Sandoval has conceded that labels only manage to achieve profitably with roughly 5% or less of their roster, surely something is wrong with the way they manage the rest of it? And this is a business model that we should be aspiring to?<br />It&#39;s time that labels are more discerning in what they want to achieve in a focused manner and also in terms of marketing, be more focused on niches and the Long Tail instead of a scattergun approach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-340795</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/18/cnet-on-music-right-advice-wrong-lessons/#comment-340795</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Tom -- I&#039;ll try and knock it off  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No need to apologize for the link -- that&#039;s a good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Tom &#8212; I&#39;ll try and knock it off  :-)</p>
<p>No need to apologize for the link &#8212; that&#39;s a good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

