<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo and CES: What&#8217;s the big deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David &#34;Lefty&#34; Schlesinger</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-374658</link>
		<dc:creator>David &#34;Lefty&#34; Schlesinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-374658</guid>
		<description>Matthew, I&#039;m not following you at all. Does someone&#039;s assessment that CES isn&#039;t interesting enough justify an ostensible &quot;journalist&quot; (over on Dave Pogue&#039;s blog, Richard is claiming that, rather than that, he&#039;s an &quot;artist&quot;...) &lt;I&gt;making &lt;/i&gt;the news (and then reporting on the &quot;news&quot; he made)....?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it not occur to you that the response of the audience during a presentation which was disrupted by the Gizmodo kiddies that the company in charge there is a) incompetent or b) makes unreliable products....? It&#039;s certain that no one would immediately think, &quot;Hey, I bet someone&#039;s fooling around with a TV-B-Gone!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is another low for Denton&#039;s ill-behaved children. I guess we should be grateful that no one gave Richard an irresistable portable projector so he could throw images of &quot;Tubgirl&quot; on people&#039;s screens. Oh, wait: he couldn&#039;t have done that &lt;I&gt;anonymously!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A very bold guy. Hm.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, I&#39;m not following you at all. Does someone&#39;s assessment that CES isn&#39;t interesting enough justify an ostensible &#8220;journalist&#8221; (over on Dave Pogue&#39;s blog, Richard is claiming that, rather than that, he&#39;s an &#8220;artist&#8221;&#8230;) <i>making </i>the news (and then reporting on the &#8220;news&#8221; he made)&#8230;.?</p>
<p>Does it not occur to you that the response of the audience during a presentation which was disrupted by the Gizmodo kiddies that the company in charge there is a) incompetent or b) makes unreliable products&#8230;.? It&#39;s certain that no one would immediately think, &#8220;Hey, I bet someone&#39;s fooling around with a TV-B-Gone!&#8221;</p>
<p>This is another low for Denton&#39;s ill-behaved children. I guess we should be grateful that no one gave Richard an irresistable portable projector so he could throw images of &#8220;Tubgirl&#8221; on people&#39;s screens. Oh, wait: he couldn&#39;t have done that <i>anonymously!</i></p>
<p>A very bold guy. Hm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David &#34;Lefty&#34; Schlesinger</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-342398</link>
		<dc:creator>David &#34;Lefty&#34; Schlesinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-342398</guid>
		<description>Matthew, I&#039;m not following you at all. Does someone&#039;s assessment that CES isn&#039;t interesting enough justify an ostensible &quot;journalist&quot; (over on Dave Pogue&#039;s blog, Richard is claiming that, rather than that, he&#039;s an &quot;artist&quot;...) &lt;I&gt;making &lt;/i&gt;the news (and then reporting on the &quot;news&quot; he made)....?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it not occur to you that the response of the audience during a presentation which was disrupted by the Gizmodo kiddies that the company in charge there is a) incompetent or b) makes unreliable products....? It&#039;s certain that no one would immediately think, &quot;Hey, I bet someone&#039;s fooling around with a TV-B-Gone!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is another low for Denton&#039;s ill-behaved children. I guess we should be grateful that no one gave Richard an irresistable portable projector so he could throw images of &quot;Tubgirl&quot; on people&#039;s screens. Oh, wait: he couldn&#039;t have done that &lt;I&gt;anonymously!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A very bold guy. Hm.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, I&#39;m not following you at all. Does someone&#39;s assessment that CES isn&#39;t interesting enough justify an ostensible &#8220;journalist&#8221; (over on Dave Pogue&#39;s blog, Richard is claiming that, rather than that, he&#39;s an &#8220;artist&#8221;&#8230;) <i>making </i>the news (and then reporting on the &#8220;news&#8221; he made)&#8230;.?</p>
<p>Does it not occur to you that the response of the audience during a presentation which was disrupted by the Gizmodo kiddies that the company in charge there is a) incompetent or b) makes unreliable products&#8230;.? It&#39;s certain that no one would immediately think, &#8220;Hey, I bet someone&#39;s fooling around with a TV-B-Gone!&#8221;</p>
<p>This is another low for Denton&#39;s ill-behaved children. I guess we should be grateful that no one gave Richard an irresistable portable projector so he could throw images of &#8220;Tubgirl&#8221; on people&#39;s screens. Oh, wait: he couldn&#39;t have done that <i>anonymously!</i></p>
<p>A very bold guy. Hm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo: Wrong, yes &#8212; but also right - - mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-336609</link>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo: Wrong, yes &#8212; but also right - - mathewingram.com/media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-336609</guid>
		<description>[...] I were smart, I would probably stay away from this topic, given the response I got to my last entry, which drew shocked blog posts, emails and Twitter messages from people like Allen Stern at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I were smart, I would probably stay away from this topic, given the response I got to my last entry, which drew shocked blog posts, emails and Twitter messages from people like Allen Stern at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo: Wrong, yes &#8212; but also right - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-336608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo: Wrong, yes &#8212; but also right - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-336608</guid>
		<description>[...] I were smart, I would probably stay away from this topic, given the response I got to my last entry, which drew shocked blog posts, emails and Twitter messages from people like Allen Stern at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I were smart, I would probably stay away from this topic, given the response I got to my last entry, which drew shocked blog posts, emails and Twitter messages from people like Allen Stern at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead Robot &#187; Dead Robot</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-336606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead Robot &#187; Dead Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/10/gizmodo-and-ces-whats-the-big-deal/#comment-336606</guid>
		<description>[...] ensues. Many tech writers complain that &#8220;bloggers&#8221; ruin the integrity of journalism. Many critics of Giz and Gawker come trolling out of the woodwork to lay down words like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ensues. Many tech writers complain that &#8220;bloggers&#8221; ruin the integrity of journalism. Many critics of Giz and Gawker come trolling out of the woodwork to lay down words like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

