http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:58:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-336484 Cuts from FIR #308 : NevilleHobson.com Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:13:24 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/#comment-336484 [...] Twitter’s productivity cost [...] [...] Twitter’s productivity cost [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-374867 mathewi Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:26:02 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/#comment-374867 A fair point, Pat. You may not have said Twitter was a waste of time,<br>but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a<br>dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I<br>think the implication is obvious. A fair point, Pat. You may not have said Twitter was a waste of time,
but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a
dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I
think the implication is obvious.

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-374868 Mark Evans Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:13:42 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/#comment-374868 I suspect what people are doing when they Twitter is taking time from other non-productive activities such as blogging, drinking coffee, having a smoke, etc. Still, it amazes how much time spend on Twitter. I suspect what people are doing when they Twitter is taking time from other non-productive activities such as blogging, drinking coffee, having a smoke, etc. Still, it amazes how much time spend on Twitter.

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-374866 Pat Phelan Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:29:13 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/#comment-374866 Matthew<br>Thanks for the post, if I had wanted to join the techmeme troll parade I think a post on Scoble/Facebook he loves it/he loves it not would probably have been an easy way to do it.<br>The really dumb part of your post was your assumption that my analysis confirmed that Twitter was a waste of time.<br>Never in the post did I say mention that Twitter was a waste of time but just point ed out the time usage, in fact I am a huge Twitter fan and everyday user. Matthew
Thanks for the post, if I had wanted to join the techmeme troll parade I think a post on Scoble/Facebook he loves it/he loves it not would probably have been an easy way to do it.
The really dumb part of your post was your assumption that my analysis confirmed that Twitter was a waste of time.
Never in the post did I say mention that Twitter was a waste of time but just point ed out the time usage, in fact I am a huge Twitter fan and everyday user.

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-341583 mathewi Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:26:02 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/04/twitters-cost-in-productivity-zero/#comment-341583 A fair point, Pat. You may not have said Twitter was a waste of time,<br>but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a<br>dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I<br>think the implication is obvious. A fair point, Pat. You may not have said Twitter was a waste of time,
but unless I'm mistaken, the whole point of your post was to put a
dollar value on lost productivity as a result of Twitter use, so I
think the implication is obvious.

]]>