Comments on: Nalts calls for Hartwell video mob http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Nalts Fans the Flames of Online Civil War — Parking Domains http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-336415 Nalts Fans the Flames of Online Civil War — Parking Domains Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:54:16 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/#comment-336415 [...] Matthew Ingram noted, fair use is slightly debatable, and Dave Winer intends to hold a Flashconf on the subject to hammer out the details of the topic [...] [...] Matthew Ingram noted, fair use is slightly debatable, and Dave Winer intends to hold a Flashconf on the subject to hammer out the details of the topic [...]

]]> By: mathewi http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-374287 mathewi Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:18:02 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/#comment-374287 You're right about the 30-second preview -- although that hasn't been<br>tested in court, and Universal Music has had even 30-second samples<br>removed from websites. As for photographs, the thumbnail has been<br>recognized in court decisions as fair use in many cases -- Google won<br>the case you're referring to. You're right about the 30-second preview — although that hasn't been
tested in court, and Universal Music has had even 30-second samples
removed from websites. As for photographs, the thumbnail has been
recognized in court decisions as fair use in many cases — Google won
the case you're referring to.

]]> By: NotaFan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-374288 NotaFan Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:50:00 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/#comment-374288 I'd never heard of you until today when I came across all of your posts and ridiculous backing of this copyright infringement and your touting those ignorant misogynists at TechCrunch and "some lawyer" they supposedly spoke to. <br><br>After reading what you've posted I don't think I'm any better for it. If anything I wish there was a way to sue you and get some compensation for my time you've wasted.<br><br>I see the video being edited a big win for us little guys. I'd never heard of you until today when I came across all of your posts and ridiculous backing of this copyright infringement and your touting those ignorant misogynists at TechCrunch and “some lawyer” they supposedly spoke to.

After reading what you've posted I don't think I'm any better for it. If anything I wish there was a way to sue you and get some compensation for my time you've wasted.

I see the video being edited a big win for us little guys.

]]> By: mathewi http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-342456 mathewi Tue, 25 Dec 2007 14:18:02 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/#comment-342456 You're right about the 30-second preview -- although that hasn't been<br>tested in court, and Universal Music has had even 30-second samples<br>removed from websites. As for photographs, the thumbnail has been<br>recognized in court decisions as fair use in many cases -- Google won<br>the case you're referring to. You're right about the 30-second preview — although that hasn't been
tested in court, and Universal Music has had even 30-second samples
removed from websites. As for photographs, the thumbnail has been
recognized in court decisions as fair use in many cases — Google won
the case you're referring to.

]]> By: NotaFan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-342457 NotaFan Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:50:00 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/24/nalts-calls-for-hartwell-video-mob/#comment-342457 I'd never heard of you until today when I came across all of your posts and ridiculous backing of this copyright infringement and your touting those ignorant misogynists at TechCrunch and "some lawyer" they supposedly spoke to. <br><br>After reading what you've posted I don't think I'm any better for it. If anything I wish there was a way to sue you and get some compensation for my time you've wasted.<br><br>I see the video being edited a big win for us little guys. I'd never heard of you until today when I came across all of your posts and ridiculous backing of this copyright infringement and your touting those ignorant misogynists at TechCrunch and “some lawyer” they supposedly spoke to.

After reading what you've posted I don't think I'm any better for it. If anything I wish there was a way to sue you and get some compensation for my time you've wasted.

I see the video being edited a big win for us little guys.

]]>