<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lane Hartwell update: Still wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trying to Be like Bill Gates &#187; It&#8217;s Time To Wean Ourselves Off An Unhealthy Addiction To Copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-336663</link>
		<dc:creator>Trying to Be like Bill Gates &#187; It&#8217;s Time To Wean Ourselves Off An Unhealthy Addiction To Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/#comment-336663</guid>
		<description>[...] in the video, and now she&#8217;s upset that it&#8217;s not in the new video. She&#8217;s in the wrong here for a variety of reasons. She misused the DMCA and now she&#8217;s demanding payment over what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the video, and now she&#8217;s upset that it&#8217;s not in the new video. She&#8217;s in the wrong here for a variety of reasons. She misused the DMCA and now she&#8217;s demanding payment over what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mike&#8217;s Internet News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s Time To Wean Ourselves Off An Unhealthy Addiction To Copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-336293</link>
		<dc:creator>El Mike&#8217;s Internet News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s Time To Wean Ourselves Off An Unhealthy Addiction To Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/#comment-336293</guid>
		<description>[...] in the video, and now she&#8217;s upset that it&#8217;s not in the new video. She&#8217;s in the wrong here for a variety of reasons. She misused the DMCA and now she&#8217;s demanding payment over what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the video, and now she&#8217;s upset that it&#8217;s not in the new video. She&#8217;s in the wrong here for a variety of reasons. She misused the DMCA and now she&#8217;s demanding payment over what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch gets it right on Hartwell - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-336292</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch gets it right on Hartwell - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/#comment-336292</guid>
		<description>[...] to spark &#8212; for better or worse &#8212; with this post, which got almost 100 comments, and a more recent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to spark &#8212; for better or worse &#8212; with this post, which got almost 100 comments, and a more recent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Great Image Reuse Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-336291</link>
		<dc:creator>odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Great Image Reuse Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/#comment-336291</guid>
		<description>[...] than recap the issues, I suggest reading Shelley Powers&#8217; and Mathew Ingram&#8217;s thoughts on the issue. It&#8217;s also worth reading the players&#8217; posts &#8212; Here is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than recap the issues, I suggest reading Shelley Powers&#8217; and Mathew Ingram&#8217;s thoughts on the issue. It&#8217;s also worth reading the players&#8217; posts &#8212; Here is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-374873</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/19/lane-hartwell-update-still-wrong/#comment-374873</guid>
		<description>My partner Peter and I had a big yak about this last night.  Peter made an interesting point about America vs. Canada which I think is partially at the heart of why I&#039;m finding this conversation so frustrating.  Pamela Wallin had been at Ideas City a couple years back and talked about the biggest difference she found between Canada and US (as the Canadian Ambassador positioned in NYC) – The litigious nature of American Culture.  It is after all the place where a man jumped in front of a subway car to commit suicide, survived and then successfully sued the city of NY.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many people have made the suggestions before but I&#039;ll add them again.  If you don&#039;t want your photos used by anyone...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- don&#039;t put them on Flickr or any other photo site without privacy settings&lt;br&gt;- put a water mark on the photos which would essentially stops anyone from using them&lt;br&gt;- go complain to Google for having an image search (who unlike flickr doesn&#039;t have a filter for searching only those photos under creative commons)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not just big business that needs to re look at the way they do business, it&#039;s independents like Lane as well.  Using the law as a big stick to ensure ‘business as usual’, will only as Zota says, end up actually hurting rather than protecting artists in the long run.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope that Lane reconsiders her decision to sue and look at the greater issues beyond what she feels is this current injustice.  There is a bigger picture out there and since Lane could have done a great deal more herself to protect her photos, she should take some responsibility and move on......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner Peter and I had a big yak about this last night.  Peter made an interesting point about America vs. Canada which I think is partially at the heart of why I&#39;m finding this conversation so frustrating.  Pamela Wallin had been at Ideas City a couple years back and talked about the biggest difference she found between Canada and US (as the Canadian Ambassador positioned in NYC) – The litigious nature of American Culture.  It is after all the place where a man jumped in front of a subway car to commit suicide, survived and then successfully sued the city of NY.</p>
<p>Many people have made the suggestions before but I&#39;ll add them again.  If you don&#39;t want your photos used by anyone&#8230;</p>
<p>- don&#39;t put them on Flickr or any other photo site without privacy settings<br />- put a water mark on the photos which would essentially stops anyone from using them<br />- go complain to Google for having an image search (who unlike flickr doesn&#39;t have a filter for searching only those photos under creative commons)</p>
<p>It&#39;s not just big business that needs to re look at the way they do business, it&#39;s independents like Lane as well.  Using the law as a big stick to ensure ‘business as usual’, will only as Zota says, end up actually hurting rather than protecting artists in the long run.   </p>
<p>I hope that Lane reconsiders her decision to sue and look at the greater issues beyond what she feels is this current injustice.  There is a bigger picture out there and since Lane could have done a great deal more herself to protect her photos, she should take some responsibility and move on&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
