<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google going after Wikipedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-341046</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-341046</guid>
		<description>one problem is that google is entering into the conflict of interest - as a search engine - that they previously shunned, and helped them become the kings of search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;other engines showed you what they wanted to show you; google showed you what you wanted to find. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as google becomes a content producer, they will, surely, game their search results in their own favour. there&#39;s no indication of how they will deal with this yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anyway, that&#39;s bad for the web, but, i suppose, inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one problem is that google is entering into the conflict of interest - as a search engine - that they previously shunned, and helped them become the kings of search.</p>
<p>other engines showed you what they wanted to show you; google showed you what you wanted to find. </p>
<p>as google becomes a content producer, they will, surely, game their search results in their own favour. there&#39;s no indication of how they will deal with this yet.</p>
<p>anyway, that&#39;s bad for the web, but, i suppose, inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-341045</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-341045</guid>
		<description>I think it will actually complement Wikipedia. Finding high quality, peer-reviewed articles on the web to support Wikipedia articles is currently really hard. If they become a success, knols could become an invaluable reference for Wikipedia articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will actually complement Wikipedia. Finding high quality, peer-reviewed articles on the web to support Wikipedia articles is currently really hard. If they become a success, knols could become an invaluable reference for Wikipedia articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goog-pedia or Just Another Google App (JAGA)?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goog-pedia or Just Another Google App (JAGA)?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336222</guid>
		<description>[...] surprisingly, there&#8217;s a lot of people such as Mathew Ingram and Steve Rubel are very excited about the possibilities but I&#8217;ll take a pragmatic approach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] surprisingly, there&#8217;s a lot of people such as Mathew Ingram and Steve Rubel are very excited about the possibilities but I&#8217;ll take a pragmatic approach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mike&#8217;s Internet News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Decides Organizing The World&#8217;s Information Is Easier If That Info Is Online</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336221</link>
		<dc:creator>El Mike&#8217;s Internet News Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Decides Organizing The World&#8217;s Information Is Easier If That Info Is Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336221</guid>
		<description>[...] on Google&#8217;s knol project would be complete without comparing it to Wikipedia (as many smart commentators are noting). However, in looking over the details, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a Wikipedia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Google&#8217;s knol project would be complete without comparing it to Wikipedia (as many smart commentators are noting). However, in looking over the details, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a Wikipedia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Decides Organizing The World&#8217;s Information Is Easier If That Info Is Online &#124; www.theirway.net</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336217</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Decides Organizing The World&#8217;s Information Is Easier If That Info Is Online &#124; www.theirway.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/14/is-google-going-after-wikipedia/#comment-336217</guid>
		<description>[...] on Google&#8217;s knol project would be complete without comparing it to Wikipedia (as many smart commentators are noting). However, in looking over the details, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a Wikipedia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Google&#8217;s knol project would be complete without comparing it to Wikipedia (as many smart commentators are noting). However, in looking over the details, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a Wikipedia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
