<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My blog is my social network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook vs. Google &#8212; the social wars - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-336183</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook vs. Google &#8212; the social wars - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-336183</guid>
		<description>[...] data can flow from one to the other and back again (Chris Messina is coming at the same idea from a different perspective). Of course, there is a possibility that Facebook and Google could work together, but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] data can flow from one to the other and back again (Chris Messina is coming at the same idea from a different perspective). Of course, there is a possibility that Facebook and Google could work together, but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karoli</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342827</link>
		<dc:creator>Karoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342827</guid>
		<description>That&#39;s exactly how I&#39;ve felt about most of these different social networks.  I use Facebook, but my updates come from my blog and my photo streams rather than from Facebook outward.  It never made sense to me to invest a ton of time in updating a Facebook page when I already have my own site, weblog, and photo communities (Flickr/Zooomr) where I have control of my content.  So I&#39;ll feed things to Facebook but never the other way around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#39;m very interested to see where Chris is going with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s exactly how I&#39;ve felt about most of these different social networks.  I use Facebook, but my updates come from my blog and my photo streams rather than from Facebook outward.  It never made sense to me to invest a ton of time in updating a Facebook page when I already have my own site, weblog, and photo communities (Flickr/Zooomr) where I have control of my content.  So I&#39;ll feed things to Facebook but never the other way around.</p>
<p>I&#39;m very interested to see where Chris is going with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342826</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342826</guid>
		<description>We&#39;re very loveable  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I definitely like the idea, Chris -- even if it is only a glimmer of&lt;br&gt;one.  I know that I (and I&#39;m sure many others) instinctively feel a&lt;br&gt;kind of force pushing me away from things like Facebook, despite its&lt;br&gt;many useful features, because I&#39;d rather control my own information&lt;br&gt;and the way I present it.  But as you point out, there are lots of&lt;br&gt;larger benefits to being a part of those walled gardens or social&lt;br&gt;nets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just out of curiosity, how do you see DiSo working with Google&#39;s OpenSocial?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#39;re very loveable  :-)</p>
<p>I definitely like the idea, Chris &#8212; even if it is only a glimmer of<br />one.  I know that I (and I&#39;m sure many others) instinctively feel a<br />kind of force pushing me away from things like Facebook, despite its<br />many useful features, because I&#39;d rather control my own information<br />and the way I present it.  But as you point out, there are lots of<br />larger benefits to being a part of those walled gardens or social<br />nets.</p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, how do you see DiSo working with Google&#39;s OpenSocial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342825</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/12/my-blog-is-my-social-network/#comment-342825</guid>
		<description>Heh, Mr. Tara Hunt. I love you Canadians! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Srsly though, I&#39;d be interested in your thoughts on the project; it&#39;s literally neo-natal right now, just beyond a sparkle in anyone&#39;s eye. Still, I think it raises the issue about what social networking might look like if it never *started* as a bunch of silos... I&#39;m going mostly on a hunch that being able to have the choice between joining a big silo or rolling your own social node is something that would be good for the current state of affairs, since currently we really can&#39;t say, with any credibility, that running your own blog today really puts you in league with the social dexterity of the mega social nets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, Mr. Tara Hunt. I love you Canadians! ;)</p>
<p>Srsly though, I&#39;d be interested in your thoughts on the project; it&#39;s literally neo-natal right now, just beyond a sparkle in anyone&#39;s eye. Still, I think it raises the issue about what social networking might look like if it never *started* as a bunch of silos&#8230; I&#39;m going mostly on a hunch that being able to have the choice between joining a big silo or rolling your own social node is something that would be good for the current state of affairs, since currently we really can&#39;t say, with any credibility, that running your own blog today really puts you in league with the social dexterity of the mega social nets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
