Comments on: Sethi: Is Hate Mail 2.0 the best response? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:05:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Sethi: Everyone is to blame except me - - mathewingram.com/work http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336196 Sethi: Everyone is to blame except me - - mathewingram.com/work Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:15:19 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336196 [...] he lied to his own staff about funding being imminent (which ex-staffer Oliver Starr described in an earlier installment of this saga), but blames that lying on Mike Arrington? Or the part where he says he has called in [...] [...] he lied to his own staff about funding being imminent (which ex-staffer Oliver Starr described in an earlier installment of this saga), but blames that lying on Mike Arrington? Or the part where he says he has called in [...]

]]> By: Soap Opera 2.0: More on Blognation - - mathewingram.com/work http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336143 Soap Opera 2.0: More on Blognation - - mathewingram.com/work Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:22:45 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336143 [...] blog that Sam Sethi set up after he was given his walking papers from TechCrunch UK. If you recall, the last episode saw Blognation writer Oliver Starr (ex of MobileCrunch) post a 3,000-word screed about Sethi and [...] [...] blog that Sam Sethi set up after he was given his walking papers from TechCrunch UK. If you recall, the last episode saw Blognation writer Oliver Starr (ex of MobileCrunch) post a 3,000-word screed about Sethi and [...]

]]> By: Sam Sethi, Thwarted Murderer? « The Pursuit of a Life http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336105 Sam Sethi, Thwarted Murderer? « The Pursuit of a Life Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:40:08 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-336105 [...] Dan York, Adam Tinworth, Debi Jones, teh Scoble, Mathew Ingram, and, in a sad story, a crazy man who may or not have been Sam Sethi in disguise rips a [...] [...] Dan York, Adam Tinworth, Debi Jones, teh Scoble, Mathew Ingram, and, in a sad story, a crazy man who may or not have been Sam Sethi in disguise rips a [...]

]]> By: sbspalding http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-339546 sbspalding Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:17:35 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-339546 I actually decided to post this particular missive. More than anything as an object lesson in how trust can break down when communication is, as we say, lax. <br><br>Was this the best path to take from a business standpoint? Probably not. However, as more of these ad hoc media networks start playing in the real world, it seems that there needs to be these kind of touchstones to remind everyone that you can just put a saddle on a Donkey and call it a Horse. I actually decided to post this particular missive. More than anything as an object lesson in how trust can break down when communication is, as we say, lax.

Was this the best path to take from a business standpoint? Probably not. However, as more of these ad hoc media networks start playing in the real world, it seems that there needs to be these kind of touchstones to remind everyone that you can just put a saddle on a Donkey and call it a Horse.

]]> By: mathewi http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-339545 mathewi Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:08:01 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/05/sethi-is-hate-mail-20-the-best-response/#comment-339545 Duncan, I think we're talking about two different things. The<br>reference I made to Mike was in regards to the email he posted back in<br>November from Sam, not the stuff you posted from Oliver. Duncan, I think we're talking about two different things. The
reference I made to Mike was in regards to the email he posted back in
November from Sam, not the stuff you posted from Oliver.

]]>