<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UGC: BusinessWeek misses the point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are we putting the blame on the user now? &#171; Alexander van Elsas&#8217;s Weblog on new media &#38; technologies and their effect on social behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-335879</link>
		<dc:creator>Are we putting the blame on the user now? &#171; Alexander van Elsas&#8217;s Weblog on new media &#38; technologies and their effect on social behavior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-335879</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram pointed me to a Business Week article in which it is said that User Generated Content is dead. The article even has a confronting title &#8220;Web video: move over amateurs&#8221;. Evidence from this bold statement came from examples where specific USG sites were closing down due to limited amounts of traffic. People now want professional content. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram pointed me to a Business Week article in which it is said that User Generated Content is dead. The article even has a confronting title &#8220;Web video: move over amateurs&#8221;. Evidence from this bold statement came from examples where specific USG sites were closing down due to limited amounts of traffic. People now want professional content. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanelsas</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340775</link>
		<dc:creator>vanelsas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340775</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathew, I think you are right about Business Week missing the point. But to add to your arguments I would say that UCG is about emotions. Nothing as powerful as a user creating something and sharing it with the world. It is all around us and although the quality isn&#39;t always great, we tend to look beyond that as we can almost feel the intention of the creator. That is waht makes user generated content fascinationg. &lt;br&gt;As an example in an industry under fire. I think the music industry should stop thinking in terms of distributiong music (and  sueing illigal downloaders) and start thinking in terms of distribution of emotions (thus embracing users and challenging them to add content to the music made by professionals).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathew, I think you are right about Business Week missing the point. But to add to your arguments I would say that UCG is about emotions. Nothing as powerful as a user creating something and sharing it with the world. It is all around us and although the quality isn&#39;t always great, we tend to look beyond that as we can almost feel the intention of the creator. That is waht makes user generated content fascinationg. <br />As an example in an industry under fire. I think the music industry should stop thinking in terms of distributiong music (and  sueing illigal downloaders) and start thinking in terms of distribution of emotions (thus embracing users and challenging them to add content to the music made by professionals).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech For Novices</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340774</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech For Novices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340774</guid>
		<description>yes mathew &#038; krishnan - you guys are right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes mathew &#038; krishnan - you guys are right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340773</link>
		<dc:creator>krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/20/ugc-businessweek-misses-the-point/#comment-340773</guid>
		<description>Does business week think that big publications offer great content? I think they should check out this insanely dumb article on WSJ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2007/11/05/google-phone-a-business-tech-nightmare-waiting-to-happen/"&gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2007/11/05/google-...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does business week think that big publications offer great content? I think they should check out this insanely dumb article on WSJ</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2007/11/05/google-phone-a-business-tech-nightmare-waiting-to-happen/"></a><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2007/11/05/google-.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2007/11/05/google-..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
