<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google&#8217;s spectrum play hubris?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norm Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/#comment-340188</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/#comment-340188</guid>
		<description>Yeah the system needs to be fixed.  North Americans are paying far too much for shoddy wireless services compared to the rest of the world.   Google spectrum and free Android software poses a huge market challenge to the telcos and cellcos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the system needs to be fixed.  North Americans are paying far too much for shoddy wireless services compared to the rest of the world.   Google spectrum and free Android software poses a huge market challenge to the telcos and cellcos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Z</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/#comment-340187</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/16/is-googles-spectrum-play-hubris/#comment-340187</guid>
		<description>Tech Trader has some more interesting insight on this calling the $8 billion just the down payment and starts throwing around some numbers on yearly cap ex which would be required to support wireless.  It&#39;s not just 2X cash flow, it will be a colossus that they need to keep supporting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2007/11/16/google-maybe-starting-a-carrier-is-bad-idea/?mod=yahoobarrons"&gt;http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2007/1...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech Trader has some more interesting insight on this calling the $8 billion just the down payment and starts throwing around some numbers on yearly cap ex which would be required to support wireless.  It&#39;s not just 2X cash flow, it will be a colossus that they need to keep supporting.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2007/11/16/google-maybe-starting-a-carrier-is-bad-idea/?mod=yahoobarrons"></a><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2007/1.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2007/1..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
