<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is email dead? No, but it&#8217;s not well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/comment-page-1/#comment-351082</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/#comment-351082</guid>
		<description>Well, email refuses to die. Although it may never completely die out - its too simple to use, were too used to it - we can at least reduce the burden on its shoulders. Email is clearly not best for collaborative work (working together on files), and we need to shift to tools which are optimal for these purposes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had recently done a whitepaper on the subject (&lt;a href=&quot;http://hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/&lt;/a&gt;) which was also covered by ZDNet (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=18692&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=18692&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, email refuses to die. Although it may never completely die out &#8211; its too simple to use, were too used to it &#8211; we can at least reduce the burden on its shoulders. Email is clearly not best for collaborative work (working together on files), and we need to shift to tools which are optimal for these purposes.</p>
<p>We had recently done a whitepaper on the subject (<a href="http://hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/" rel="nofollow">http://hyperoffice.com/business-email-overload/</a>) which was also covered by ZDNet (<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=18692" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=18692</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: named</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/comment-page-1/#comment-342947</link>
		<dc:creator>named</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/#comment-342947</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.divxtodvdconvertermac.net&quot;&gt;divx to dvd converter mac&lt;/a&gt; allows you to convert divx videos to dvd on mac with just a few simple steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.divxtodvdconvertermac.net">divx to dvd converter mac</a> allows you to convert divx videos to dvd on mac with just a few simple steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Cangialosi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/comment-page-1/#comment-335821</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Cangialosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/#comment-335821</guid>
		<description>Far, far, far from being dead for sure. Like Tom O&#039;Leary mentions above, email is evolving with the rest of the landscape. Its role is changing and despite what other may think, I believe its role is becoming more important than ever.

Sure email has had its challenges and still does, but as a social and certainly a marketing medium, its alive and well and about to be seen in a new light soon.

Thanks for the post - this is a good conversation.

- Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far, far, far from being dead for sure. Like Tom O&#8217;Leary mentions above, email is evolving with the rest of the landscape. Its role is changing and despite what other may think, I believe its role is becoming more important than ever.</p>
<p>Sure email has had its challenges and still does, but as a social and certainly a marketing medium, its alive and well and about to be seen in a new light soon.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post &#8211; this is a good conversation.</p>
<p>- Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/comment-page-1/#comment-335788</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/#comment-335788</guid>
		<description>Silliness! Email is doing better than it was not so long ago. What was killing email was spam, and spam fighting is getting better. Phishing is still a problem, but that can happen anywhere. 

But until there is a proper replacement for (reasonably) private asynchronous communication more than 144 characters long, email will live on. You can&#039;t run a business on IM and Twitter or by txtng or &quot;poking&quot; people. Maybe email is not fun socially for kids, but right now there&#039;s no replacement except to move backwards to snail mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silliness! Email is doing better than it was not so long ago. What was killing email was spam, and spam fighting is getting better. Phishing is still a problem, but that can happen anywhere. </p>
<p>But until there is a proper replacement for (reasonably) private asynchronous communication more than 144 characters long, email will live on. You can&#8217;t run a business on IM and Twitter or by txtng or &#8220;poking&#8221; people. Maybe email is not fun socially for kids, but right now there&#8217;s no replacement except to move backwards to snail mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antje Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/comment-page-1/#comment-335784</link>
		<dc:creator>Antje Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/15/is-email-dead-no-but-its-not-well/#comment-335784</guid>
		<description>just wait until they will get jobs (well we hope) and yes they will have to use email and, god forbid, letters/phone. How can one do business on twitter, social networks, text and IM? There is a time and a place for all of these. Kids have no reason to send email b/c they are instantly connected and know each other. But the same personal rules of engagement don&#039;t apply in a professional setting. Just give them a few years. They said email would be the post office killer and I still get daily mail from the post office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wait until they will get jobs (well we hope) and yes they will have to use email and, god forbid, letters/phone. How can one do business on twitter, social networks, text and IM? There is a time and a place for all of these. Kids have no reason to send email b/c they are instantly connected and know each other. But the same personal rules of engagement don&#8217;t apply in a professional setting. Just give them a few years. They said email would be the post office killer and I still get daily mail from the post office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

