Comments on: Can getting social make email better? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:12:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Deva Hazarika http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335752 Deva Hazarika Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:34:28 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335752 Making another Facebook isn't the opportunity. Doing things that leverage all of the information stored within email to figure out how to enable more relevant and powerful interactions - that's a huge opportunity. People already know who they are connected to within their email contacts. Providing profiles for those people is much less interesting than understanding things about the nature of your communications with them. More here: http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/inbox-20---emai.html Making another Facebook isn’t the opportunity. Doing things that leverage all of the information stored within email to figure out how to enable more relevant and powerful interactions - that’s a huge opportunity. People already know who they are connected to within their email contacts. Providing profiles for those people is much less interesting than understanding things about the nature of your communications with them. More here: http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/inbox-20—emai.html

]]> By: Mathew http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335751 Mathew Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:30:17 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335751 Well, Jake, all I can go by is my 18-year-old daughter and most of her friends -- and a number of twentysomethings I've spoken to as well. For them, email is a last resort that barely ever gets checked or responded to -- preferred methods of communication start with cellphone, then text message, then IM, then Facebook. Email is way down at the bottom -- right next to "write a letter" :-) Well, Jake, all I can go by is my 18-year-old daughter and most of her friends — and a number of twentysomethings I’ve spoken to as well.

For them, email is a last resort that barely ever gets checked or responded to — preferred methods of communication start with cellphone, then text message, then IM, then Facebook.

Email is way down at the bottom — right next to “write a letter” :-)

]]> By: Jake http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335750 Jake Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:16 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335750 Oh, I guess you are right. I just saw this: http://www.slate.com/id/2177969/ Oh, I guess you are right. I just saw this: http://www.slate.com/id/2177969/

]]> By: Jake http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335749 Jake Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:14:35 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/14/can-getting-social-make-email-better/#comment-335749 "My other concern is that for people below the age of 25 or so, email is a virtually non-existent form of communication." Is that really true? I mean, I know everyone uses facebook/myspace/etc, but I've never had the impression that the youngsters (I'm on the cusp of youngsterhood myself--barely) don't use email. “My other concern is that for people below the age of 25 or so, email is a virtually non-existent form of communication.”

Is that really true? I mean, I know everyone uses facebook/myspace/etc, but I’ve never had the impression that the youngsters (I’m on the cusp of youngsterhood myself–barely) don’t use email.

]]>