Comments on: Google as the saviour of everything http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Karoli http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-335728 Karoli Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:19:24 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/#comment-335728 I agree with you. It's one thing to acquire Internet companies and quite another to acquire telcos, where the morass of federal regulations, rules and gladhanding (at least in this country) are the rules rather than the exceptions. I can't think of anything that would turn Google profits downward faster than acquisition of a company like Sprint. They need to stay out of the existing telco space and create a new one. I agree with you. It’s one thing to acquire Internet companies and quite another to acquire telcos, where the morass of federal regulations, rules and gladhanding (at least in this country) are the rules rather than the exceptions.

I can’t think of anything that would turn Google profits downward faster than acquisition of a company like Sprint. They need to stay out of the existing telco space and create a new one.

]]> By: Stuart MacDonald http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-335724 Stuart MacDonald Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:54:48 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/#comment-335724 Nailed it 'thewie. Nailed it ‘thewie.

]]> By: Joe Duck http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-335715 Joe Duck Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:13:31 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/11/google-as-the-saviour-of-everything/#comment-335715 Right *as usual* Mr. Matt. Why would Google want to be burdened with Sprint when they can run ads on Sprint, and ATT, etc without messing with all the fuss? Right *as usual* Mr. Matt. Why would Google want to be burdened with Sprint when they can run ads on Sprint, and ATT, etc without messing with all the fuss?

]]>