<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kleiner: Web 2.0 is so over, dude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Foremski</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-335617</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Foremski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-335617</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing about my post about funding Web 2.0 companies is that we don&#039;t have a definition of the term Web 2.0. Which doesn&#039;t really matter, because we are now in a 2.5ish transition to something new... Come to our 2.5 Web conference in SF in December :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about my post about funding Web 2.0 companies is that we don&#8217;t have a definition of the term Web 2.0. Which doesn&#8217;t really matter, because we are now in a 2.5ish transition to something new&#8230; Come to our 2.5 Web conference in SF in December :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-335597</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-335597</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;startup CEOs hoping to get rich quick can go back to working at Kinkoâ€™s .... &lt;/i&gt;

... where they&#039;ll work hard for 3000 years making 3 trillion copies to repay their 5 million round of VC funding.   That&#039;s a virtuous cycle, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>startup CEOs hoping to get rich quick can go back to working at Kinkoâ€™s &#8230;. </i></p>
<p>&#8230; where they&#8217;ll work hard for 3000 years making 3 trillion copies to repay their 5 million round of VC funding.   That&#8217;s a virtuous cycle, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-335572</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-335572</guid>
		<description>Hey -- I haven&#039;t used the word &quot;dude&quot; in a headline since February!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8212; I haven&#8217;t used the word &#8220;dude&#8221; in a headline since February!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Mahn</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-335571</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Mahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-335571</guid>
		<description>Mathew, what&#039;s with all the &quot;dude&quot; references? :-D

Agreed on the web 2.0 financing stuff tho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew, what&#8217;s with all the &#8220;dude&#8221; references? :-D</p>
<p>Agreed on the web 2.0 financing stuff tho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-335567</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/05/kleiner-web-20-is-so-over-dude/#comment-335567</guid>
		<description>&quot;Web2.0&quot; may be a little dry now, but the Web in general sure isn&#039;t.  Online advertising is still posting healthy gains, and hypertargeted ads (or &#039;social ads&#039;) in social networks is just going to further drive the growth rate upwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Web2.0&#8243; may be a little dry now, but the Web in general sure isn&#8217;t.  Online advertising is still posting healthy gains, and hypertargeted ads (or &#8217;social ads&#8217;) in social networks is just going to further drive the growth rate upwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
