<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Cuban is lazy, and so are you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/04/mark-cuban-is-lazy-and-so-are-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/04/mark-cuban-is-lazy-and-so-are-you/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/04/mark-cuban-is-lazy-and-so-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-335562</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 04:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/04/mark-cuban-is-lazy-and-so-are-you/#comment-335562</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it will effectively be in the driverâ€™s seat as far as its 50 million users are concerned â€” regardless of what Google and its OpenSocial partners do&lt;/i&gt;

Matt I think this is a good summary and agree with Cuban about this part - it&#039;s a point Don Dodge was also making about people not defecting from Facebook, and 100 million eyeballs is a lot.  But it&#039;s nothing like the billions of eyeballs at stake over the next few years.

It seems to me that a lack of loyalty is the deal here and there is little for any social network.  Mark&#039;s put a lot into Facebook (he has thousands of FB &quot;friends&quot;.   I&#039;m more typical with about 45 friends and I could care less if I&#039;m interacting with them via FB.  In fact I prefer blogging and commenting as we are doing here - that is *high quality* interaction!   

In fact I&#039;ll bet ONE BILLION of Mark&#039;s dollars that as soon as it&#039;s easy for him to socialize his own website via Open Social and have people flowing in and out easily, he&#039;ll be there more than he&#039;ll be at Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it will effectively be in the driverâ€™s seat as far as its 50 million users are concerned â€” regardless of what Google and its OpenSocial partners do</i></p>
<p>Matt I think this is a good summary and agree with Cuban about this part &#8211; it&#8217;s a point Don Dodge was also making about people not defecting from Facebook, and 100 million eyeballs is a lot.  But it&#8217;s nothing like the billions of eyeballs at stake over the next few years.</p>
<p>It seems to me that a lack of loyalty is the deal here and there is little for any social network.  Mark&#8217;s put a lot into Facebook (he has thousands of FB &#8220;friends&#8221;.   I&#8217;m more typical with about 45 friends and I could care less if I&#8217;m interacting with them via FB.  In fact I prefer blogging and commenting as we are doing here &#8211; that is *high quality* interaction!   </p>
<p>In fact I&#8217;ll bet ONE BILLION of Mark&#8217;s dollars that as soon as it&#8217;s easy for him to socialize his own website via Open Social and have people flowing in and out easily, he&#8217;ll be there more than he&#8217;ll be at Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

