<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe people don&#8217;t really want UGC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/22/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/22/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/22/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-335363</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/22/maybe-people-dont-really-want-ugc/#comment-335363</guid>
		<description>If UGC is posed only as &quot;creative&quot; work - your point is definitely worth making.

Of course, there is more to the &quot;wisdom of crowds thing&quot; or the &quot;wikinomics thing&quot; than just a bunch of backyard wrasslers seeking Specialness as described in Hal Niedzviecki&#039;s last book.

That sounds like supply without demand. I think that&#039;s what a lot of the long tail is, at least in digital content. Unsuccessful artists who now have a cool web 2.0 excuse for wasting their time can talk about that whole tail thing :)

However, where the individual&#039;s contribution amounts to valuable *information* that can be shared and tapped into by others, then it becomes powerful.

It&#039;s out there. We&#039;ll find it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If UGC is posed only as &#8220;creative&#8221; work &#8211; your point is definitely worth making.</p>
<p>Of course, there is more to the &#8220;wisdom of crowds thing&#8221; or the &#8220;wikinomics thing&#8221; than just a bunch of backyard wrasslers seeking Specialness as described in Hal Niedzviecki&#8217;s last book.</p>
<p>That sounds like supply without demand. I think that&#8217;s what a lot of the long tail is, at least in digital content. Unsuccessful artists who now have a cool web 2.0 excuse for wasting their time can talk about that whole tail thing :)</p>
<p>However, where the individual&#8217;s contribution amounts to valuable *information* that can be shared and tapped into by others, then it becomes powerful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s out there. We&#8217;ll find it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
