Radiohead pulls in $10-million in a day

by Mathew on October 15, 2007 · Comments

(this is cross-posted from my Globe and Mail blog)

When Radiohead’s “pay what you want” download experiment was first announced a couple of weeks ago, it seemed obvious that fans (particularly the poor ones) would like the idea. But would it actually work? And would the band make any money, or would most people download it for nothing?

Despite some early glitches caused by a rush of would-be downloaders, and some carping from fans about song quality, the early indications are that the experiment has been a raging success, and that a majority of people are willing to pay as much or more for such an album as they would if they bought it through iTunes or any other traditional method.

In fact, if some of the early reports about the project turn out to be true, the trickle of interest that some bands showed in the idea initially (including Oasis and Jamiroquai, as well as Nine Inch Nails) could soon become an avalanche: According to some estimates, Radiohead may have made over $10-million (U.S.) in a single day.

The day after In Rainbows went on sale on October 10th, music-industry blog Gigwise said it had learned from sources close to the band that Radiohead had already sold more than 1.2 million copies of the album. And while it’s impossible to know what everyone paid for those downloads, industry polls showed that a majority of people buying the album were paying between $1 and $20.

In other words, Radiohead could easily have made over $10-million in the first 24 hours, and likely made substantially more than that in the first two days of offering downloads. And those figures don’t include the number of fans who chose to pay $80 for the deluxe boxed-set CD of the album. Some fans actually paid the maximum amount the system was set up to process: 99 British pounds, or about $200.

Considering the group will keep the vast majority of that estimated $10-million-plus in revenue — in contrast with the small percentage most groups get with the traditional record-label process — more than one band has to be looking at Radiohead’s move as a model

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tom
    I'm one of those buyers (paid $7). Like the album, but Radiohead deceived those who bought the download. In retrospect it's clear this was a well-orchestrated ploy on their part:

    Dear Radiohead: How Does It Feel To Out-Label The Labels?

    If a LABEL had orchestrated this, everyone would be up in arms, but since it was a popular band no one seems to care. Oh well, I learned my lesson.
  • Tom,

    How did Radiohead deceive you?

    I dig the album too, but I haven't played it on a high-end system yet, so I don't know how the audio quality stacks up to my standards (I digg vinyl).
  • Ruaidhri
    Catch a bloody grip, people.Of course they wanted to make money. They have jobs, just like anybody else, and they deserve to get paid for the work they do. We paid the money for the music, and we got the music. Not only did we get the music, it was wonderful. Hardly a deceipt. Quit your yapping.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: