<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Why Jaiku and not Twitter&#063;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-335202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comment-335202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen has some valid points particularly the last two. Heck Google probably bought Jaiku with TODAY&#039;s stock increase!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen has some valid points particularly the last two. Heck Google probably bought Jaiku with TODAY&#8217;s stock increase!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-335189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comment-335189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those are all good points, Allen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are all good points, Allen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen stern</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-335188</link>
		<dc:creator>allen stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comment-335188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good post mathew - you can click my name for my full thoughts but here are some notes:

-- jaiku can be molded, twitter already has too many scobles

-- not sure if jaiku had vc, but it probably made the purchase smaller and easier

-- with the stock price changes over the past month, this acq probably cost them nothing :)

-- twitter has big issues with stability]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post mathew &#8211; you can click my name for my full thoughts but here are some notes:</p>
<p>&#8211; jaiku can be molded, twitter already has too many scobles</p>
<p>&#8211; not sure if jaiku had vc, but it probably made the purchase smaller and easier</p>
<p>&#8211; with the stock price changes over the past month, this acq probably cost them nothing :)</p>
<p>&#8211; twitter has big issues with stability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ostrow</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-335187</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Ostrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comment-335187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be surprised if that happened.  I haven&#039;t been able to track down Dodgeball numbers circa acquisition time, but I&#039;m assuming Jaiku&#039;s user base is way bigger than Dodgeball&#039;s was when Google bought it.  Dodgeball was a little ahead of its time IMO, but Jaiku has too many users at this point for Google to totally ignore the community and catch the wave of negative PR.  At least, that&#039;s how I would rationally think about it ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if that happened.  I haven&#8217;t been able to track down Dodgeball numbers circa acquisition time, but I&#8217;m assuming Jaiku&#8217;s user base is way bigger than Dodgeball&#8217;s was when Google bought it.  Dodgeball was a little ahead of its time IMO, but Jaiku has too many users at this point for Google to totally ignore the community and catch the wave of negative PR.  At least, that&#8217;s how I would rationally think about it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-335186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/10/09/google-why-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comment-335186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would guess that it has more to do with the fact that jaiku has an actual mobile client.  Google needs peole for their Gphone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that it has more to do with the fact that jaiku has an actual mobile client.  Google needs peole for their Gphone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
