<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday&#63; Time for a new Technorati strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tish Grier</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-324169</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/#comment-324169</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite know what the whole Technorati Topics thing is about (maybe a re-working of Favorites combined with WTF?...I don&#039;t know...)  but one thing I do know, and remember, is that rank was, at one time, a very important and hotly-debated topic among bloggers.  The theory went that advertisers and marketers *might* want to advertise on blogs, and that they would want the top ranking blogs--the ones with them most links, not nec. readers--to be the places to put premium, high paying advertising.  

it was thought that links and readers(page views) went hand in hand--that is, until some enterprising folks found ways to rig pageviews...

To get rank, one had to have a combination of permalinks and post links.  Permalinks being those in people&#039;s blogrolls.  Post links being those links in posts.  Those are all crunched in some calculation to give you rank/authority/your position in the &quot;--list&quot; in the blogosphere.  

There was also some other &quot;popularity&quot; thing brought in...but I have no idea where that measure came from...

But nowadays, blog success isn&#039;t necessarily predicated solely on rank.  It can be a combination of traffic (as in page views, another disputed measurement), comments, links (both perma and post--that is, if perma still exist) or other criteria.  In a world of RSS readers, trackbacks, Google Page rank, and other means of measuring influence, the notion of influence and authority being measured strictly by links isn&#039;t what it used to be.  

I&#039;ll be posting more on this later at my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite know what the whole Technorati Topics thing is about (maybe a re-working of Favorites combined with WTF?&#8230;I don&#8217;t know&#8230;)  but one thing I do know, and remember, is that rank was, at one time, a very important and hotly-debated topic among bloggers.  The theory went that advertisers and marketers *might* want to advertise on blogs, and that they would want the top ranking blogs&#8211;the ones with them most links, not nec. readers&#8211;to be the places to put premium, high paying advertising.  </p>
<p>it was thought that links and readers(page views) went hand in hand&#8211;that is, until some enterprising folks found ways to rig pageviews&#8230;</p>
<p>To get rank, one had to have a combination of permalinks and post links.  Permalinks being those in people&#8217;s blogrolls.  Post links being those links in posts.  Those are all crunched in some calculation to give you rank/authority/your position in the &#8220;&#8211;list&#8221; in the blogosphere.  </p>
<p>There was also some other &#8220;popularity&#8221; thing brought in&#8230;but I have no idea where that measure came from&#8230;</p>
<p>But nowadays, blog success isn&#8217;t necessarily predicated solely on rank.  It can be a combination of traffic (as in page views, another disputed measurement), comments, links (both perma and post&#8211;that is, if perma still exist) or other criteria.  In a world of RSS readers, trackbacks, Google Page rank, and other means of measuring influence, the notion of influence and authority being measured strictly by links isn&#8217;t what it used to be.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be posting more on this later at my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-324149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/11/tuesday63-time-for-a-new-technorati-strategy/#comment-324149</guid>
		<description>I expected Technorati Topics to be more Techmeme-ish as well. What&#039;s there pales in comparison to Techmeme, Reddit, etc. It is sad and interesting to see Technorati scrambling to stay vibrant when it has such a head start just a couple of years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expected Technorati Topics to be more Techmeme-ish as well. What&#8217;s there pales in comparison to Techmeme, Reddit, etc. It is sad and interesting to see Technorati scrambling to stay vibrant when it has such a head start just a couple of years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
