<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers ignore Google at their peril</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chartreuse</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-307964</link>
		<dc:creator>chartreuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-307964</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not going away. I think it&#039;s a great idea.

The real reason for Newspapers continued sharp decline is the fact that they have no idea how to leverage a community. The News, which was once scarce is now abundant. That means that newspapers need to shift from being general content creators to context creators.
Unfortunately, google beat them to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not going away. I think it&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
<p>The real reason for Newspapers continued sharp decline is the fact that they have no idea how to leverage a community. The News, which was once scarce is now abundant. That means that newspapers need to shift from being general content creators to context creators.<br />
Unfortunately, google beat them to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-307618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-307618</guid>
		<description>I agree Tish. 

And Steven, I still haven&#039;t seen a story with comments on it -- I looked for one of the ones that appeared in screenshots when the feature was first announced but couldn&#039;t find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Tish. </p>
<p>And Steven, I still haven&#8217;t seen a story with comments on it &#8212; I looked for one of the ones that appeared in screenshots when the feature was first announced but couldn&#8217;t find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-307162</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-307162</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen any examples of a commented  on google news story?  Is there a way to aggregate for stories that have comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen any examples of a commented  on google news story?  Is there a way to aggregate for stories that have comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish Grier</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/comment-page-1/#comment-307090</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/18/newspapers-ignore-google-at-their-peril/#comment-307090</guid>
		<description>neither kerfuffle, nor brouhaha....more like tempest-in-a-teapot...it must&#039;ve been a slow news day for so many folks to get their knickers in a bunch over this.  

What the LATimes said was pretty much what went around the blogosphere about the whole GoogleNews comments thing anyway...except maybe for the Bin Laden thing.  That sounded more like an inside joke that originated at some conference, got published on somebody&#039;s blog, and then everybody said &quot;well, it was funny &lt;i&gt;at the time&lt;/i&gt;...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neither kerfuffle, nor brouhaha&#8230;.more like tempest-in-a-teapot&#8230;it must&#8217;ve been a slow news day for so many folks to get their knickers in a bunch over this.  </p>
<p>What the LATimes said was pretty much what went around the blogosphere about the whole GoogleNews comments thing anyway&#8230;except maybe for the Bin Laden thing.  That sounded more like an inside joke that originated at some conference, got published on somebody&#8217;s blog, and then everybody said &#8220;well, it was funny <i>at the time</i>&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
