<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sifry out, layoffs galore at Technorati</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-308810</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/#comment-308810</guid>
		<description>I am going with this&quot;I really donâ€™t understand how Google Blogâ€™s search prioritisation rules actually workâ€¦the results seem fairly random at times.&quot; Great point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going with this&#8221;I really donâ€™t understand how Google Blogâ€™s search prioritisation rules actually workâ€¦the results seem fairly random at times.&#8221; Great point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpragueD</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-306596</link>
		<dc:creator>SpragueD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/#comment-306596</guid>
		<description>Much ado about not much.

Eight people laid off is hardly a catastrophe. I work in an ad agency that has seen over a hundred cut from a single office this summer. Perspective appreciated.

Technorati never had a chance (said with 20/20 hindsight) because there was never that much that differentiated their relevance algorithm from Google&#039;s. Blogs, despite the peculiar moniker, are just dynamic sites that can be crawled by any robot and measured against linkbacks. Google wrote that book.

The Web 2.0 deadpool swells...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much ado about not much.</p>
<p>Eight people laid off is hardly a catastrophe. I work in an ad agency that has seen over a hundred cut from a single office this summer. Perspective appreciated.</p>
<p>Technorati never had a chance (said with 20/20 hindsight) because there was never that much that differentiated their relevance algorithm from Google&#8217;s. Blogs, despite the peculiar moniker, are just dynamic sites that can be crawled by any robot and measured against linkbacks. Google wrote that book.</p>
<p>The Web 2.0 deadpool swells&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-306387</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/#comment-306387</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tish...heaven knows Technorati is not perfect, but it sees a lot more of our links than Google Blogs does. In addition, I really don&#039;t understand how Google Blog&#039;s search prioritisation rules actually work...the results seem fairly random at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tish&#8230;heaven knows Technorati is not perfect, but it sees a lot more of our links than Google Blogs does. In addition, I really don&#8217;t understand how Google Blog&#8217;s search prioritisation rules actually work&#8230;the results seem fairly random at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish Grier</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-306358</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/#comment-306358</guid>
		<description>Google may, as you say, be eating Technorati&#039;s lunch, but Google absolutely stinks for finding out who&#039;s linking to your blog--that is, unless you&#039;re a high-ranked blog.  Plus, Google put NOFOLLOW tags in the metadata of blogs that didn&#039;t convert their templates to the simple-stupid, non HTML templates in the Google/Blogger merger--thus making those of us who love tinkering with our HTML out of search for about 4-8 weeks....

Technorati may have its quirks, but Google is hardly the best for blog search.  Their excessive automation and lousy customer service make them less than admirable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may, as you say, be eating Technorati&#8217;s lunch, but Google absolutely stinks for finding out who&#8217;s linking to your blog&#8211;that is, unless you&#8217;re a high-ranked blog.  Plus, Google put NOFOLLOW tags in the metadata of blogs that didn&#8217;t convert their templates to the simple-stupid, non HTML templates in the Google/Blogger merger&#8211;thus making those of us who love tinkering with our HTML out of search for about 4-8 weeks&#8230;.</p>
<p>Technorati may have its quirks, but Google is hardly the best for blog search.  Their excessive automation and lousy customer service make them less than admirable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech @ IDT</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-306186</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech @ IDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/16/sifry-out-layoffs-galore-at-technorati/#comment-306186</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not that surprised about what&#039;s going on over there. Aside from the Google lunch eating, there&#039;s been technical issue after technical issue to the point where I&#039;ve tried not to care about the service, whether I&#039;m being indexed/ranked, etc...  I found I was writing rants about the poor service all the time.

One thing is certain though, the domain is worth a heck of lot of money. So many incoming links to it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not that surprised about what&#8217;s going on over there. Aside from the Google lunch eating, there&#8217;s been technical issue after technical issue to the point where I&#8217;ve tried not to care about the service, whether I&#8217;m being indexed/ranked, etc&#8230;  I found I was writing rants about the poor service all the time.</p>
<p>One thing is certain though, the domain is worth a heck of lot of money. So many incoming links to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

