<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google getting serious about mobile&#063;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbian</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-337045</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-337045</guid>
		<description>Who is the new head of mobile department of Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the new head of mobile department of Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zec</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-284814</link>
		<dc:creator>Zec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-284814</guid>
		<description>Yes, you asked some very interesting questions . I asked myself something similar.

 I had hoped Google will get more involved with Apple into mobility project.
 I was very wrong.

 Still, to me, it is unclear the nature of Google Apple partnership.
From the business perspective and acquisitioins, It could be like &#039;&#039;or&#039;&#039; suggested. 

But Google bought Neven Vision which had a iScout project fully developed at that time.

 To me, if Google plans to enter mobile biz then they will somehow use it in their advantage. I hoped it will be integrated into iPhone. It wasn&#039;t.

Mobile software like iScout could really change mobile advertising ( combination of Maps and Local APIs ). So, I really don&#039;t know how Google plans to roll out mobile strategy in the future.

I know Micheal Jones and John Hanke spoke much last months about Google plans with Maps and Earth product portfoilo. Jones even said &#039;&#039;iphone is tri-corder of our times&#039;&#039;.

Now we know, it is not.

By the way, even though iPhone intriduced radical proposition for UI on mobile phones, some handset makers do see it like evolution ( not revolution ) and they are slowly introducing their models.

Just look at new Sony Ericsson W960i. It&#039;s in the same product range like iPhone and N95.

It&#039;s very nice designed, touchscreen, multimedia and a tons of power that iPhone lacks.

Just some thoughts.

I really do wait time when I&#039;ll walk with phone in my hand, pointing camera on the phone into buliding and getting scanned enviroment ( connecting physical and virtual realm )

Nokia the other day introduce ( concept ) point&amp;find. That&#039;s exactly how search should be done on mobile phone. With camera as an option, not only textual search.

The next year will be doable, i guess

http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22740</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you asked some very interesting questions . I asked myself something similar.</p>
<p> I had hoped Google will get more involved with Apple into mobility project.<br />
 I was very wrong.</p>
<p> Still, to me, it is unclear the nature of Google Apple partnership.<br />
From the business perspective and acquisitioins, It could be like &#8221;or&#8221; suggested. </p>
<p>But Google bought Neven Vision which had a iScout project fully developed at that time.</p>
<p> To me, if Google plans to enter mobile biz then they will somehow use it in their advantage. I hoped it will be integrated into iPhone. It wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Mobile software like iScout could really change mobile advertising ( combination of Maps and Local APIs ). So, I really don&#8217;t know how Google plans to roll out mobile strategy in the future.</p>
<p>I know Micheal Jones and John Hanke spoke much last months about Google plans with Maps and Earth product portfoilo. Jones even said &#8221;iphone is tri-corder of our times&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now we know, it is not.</p>
<p>By the way, even though iPhone intriduced radical proposition for UI on mobile phones, some handset makers do see it like evolution ( not revolution ) and they are slowly introducing their models.</p>
<p>Just look at new Sony Ericsson W960i. It&#8217;s in the same product range like iPhone and N95.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very nice designed, touchscreen, multimedia and a tons of power that iPhone lacks.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts.</p>
<p>I really do wait time when I&#8217;ll walk with phone in my hand, pointing camera on the phone into buliding and getting scanned enviroment ( connecting physical and virtual realm )</p>
<p>Nokia the other day introduce ( concept ) point&amp;find. That&#8217;s exactly how search should be done on mobile phone. With camera as an option, not only textual search.</p>
<p>The next year will be doable, i guess</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22740" rel="nofollow">http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22740</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod / techfold.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-277229</link>
		<dc:creator>rod / techfold.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-277229</guid>
		<description>Google has appeared to be stretched thin for sometime, both in terms of updating their core products, and making use of acquisitions. I wouldn&#039;t think a buy of this type signals anything more than a speculative hedge buy on Google&#039;s part. JMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has appeared to be stretched thin for sometime, both in terms of updating their core products, and making use of acquisitions. I wouldn&#8217;t think a buy of this type signals anything more than a speculative hedge buy on Google&#8217;s part. JMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-277224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-277224</guid>
		<description>Or, that&#039;s a fair point.  Thanks for making it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, that&#8217;s a fair point.  Thanks for making it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: or</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-277170</link>
		<dc:creator>or</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/25/is-google-getting-serious-about-mobile/#comment-277170</guid>
		<description>Exactly how do you think google maps for mobile, plus gmail app was produced (and don&#039;t forget Goog-411).  Obviously those acquisitions had something to do with those (excluding Dodgeball).  Also I think the android and reqwireless acquisitions was just part of completing their mobile department.  I never understood why the blogosphere believes that every acquisition must lead to a direct product, sometimes it&#039;s just the absorption of technology, and human resources into current development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how do you think google maps for mobile, plus gmail app was produced (and don&#8217;t forget Goog-411).  Obviously those acquisitions had something to do with those (excluding Dodgeball).  Also I think the android and reqwireless acquisitions was just part of completing their mobile department.  I never understood why the blogosphere believes that every acquisition must lead to a direct product, sometimes it&#8217;s just the absorption of technology, and human resources into current development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

